Search results

Why NO possibility?

Aaaaannd... Back on topic finally. IF they are connected, then I'm not sure whether it's one or two. I don't think it could be more than two as someone would let something slip. You talk about father and son, but what about Brothers, where one is dominant (usually older), the other compliant...

Or it could be a correction to a previously incorrect article. Someone should contact Crowley for confirmation whether he still believes it was two or if he got it wrong and it was four.

Then we are talking at cross purposes my friend. Personally I'm undecided whether they are connected. But you can't just ignore them.

Ok. You have no evidence to suggest the older remains in manorville aren't connected though.

Right, so to be clear, when you refer to LISK you are refering to GB4 only?

So what's the MO linking the GB4 to the manorville victims? Including the males.

Where does it say about garbage bags? I'm not suggesting his information wasn't correct. I'm suggesting that perhaps it was incomplete.

Where is that evidence?

Good post - for me it depends on whether you believe there are one or more killers. If we go with a 1 killer theory, in my opinion he display strong traits from 1 and 4. Touching on 3 for at least some of the victims, but it'd need more proof, although the GB4 were all prostitutes, there hasn't...

Respectfully snipped due to length. I've read this before, and I think I commented at the time on another thread that I find it a very amateurish profile. I have considered that perhaps the spelling mistakes could be deliberate as well to appeal to the sociopath within LISK and draw him out...

As LTEC said, there has been a few variations. The fact is, LE are probably holding snippets of information back. Note the use of the "stuffed into burlap sacks". Could be journalistic sensationalism, or it could mean something like dismemberment and placed into burlap sacks. If the latter it...

It's been talked about many times on various threads. SC law prohibits the release of any 911 call. It'd open the floodgate if the court overturns that law, I don't know if any case is ongoing at the moment to change it. I'm not sure if anything is on that tape that would help/not help. Sure...

Because its a question that needed to be asked. Someone else asked it too. You appear to be in contact with Josh a fair bit. By the way not in any way am I pointing any fingers, suggesting you know more than you are letting on. You are doing some amazing sleuthing.

So were you the one who took the picture? Seems to me you skipped over that question.

This seems a bit muddled. Why would the post crop out another bone Followed by Josh got the photo from the post. How could this be if the post used the cropped photo only?

You've mentioned Josh and the killing season time on a few occasions now. People are going to start to wonder if in fact you are Josh Zeman soon.

That's my point. There is no credit. Usually it's state stock photo or photo courtesy of. Etc etc. However a backwards search indictated no hits on the image before that article. Weird.

Is it usual for newspapers to post pictures of a newly discovered potential crime scene? I'm also leaning towards a stock photo. Though it does appear the skull has fillings from first glance which are referenced in the article. I see no reference to the hunter being credited for the photo...

At first I thought about house prices, but apparently they didn't drop off. He bought in 2012 or 2013.