Search results

My bet is 'no'. Some folks here that are in BC's corner here went a bit wobbly when the Google maps search testimony broke. But, within a couple of days, they had bucked up and were buying the defense's absurd evidence planting/tampering claims. I would expect that the same pattern would hold...

There is no reason for the call to have appeared on any Cisco records. In fact, if it did show up there, it would not have had the effect that he wanted it to (looking like it came from the home phone). I posted the diagram attached below before. It shows how this would have been connected...

Right, so instead, the CPD computer gurus who were smart enough to plant and/or change the dates on the map images and to even think to change the dates on the cursor files were so dumb as to mistakenly change the dates on hundreds of files, including changing to some invalid dates.

I'm pretty sure that I said that, unlike others here, I don't consider myself to be in a position to know how she felt.

I think that whether some specific actions are considered abusive varies depending on whether you are on the giving or receiving end of those actions. I am in no position to say whether NC felt abused or not.

I believe that it was alleged that the marriage was defined by domestic abuse, not domestic violence. The further allegation is that domestic abuse ultimately ended in domestic violence.

I suspect that to most, killing your wife qualifies as domestic violence.

I'm lost. I thought that we were talking about the Windows Event Log info, not the Google Maps. The Windows Event Log was what the rebuttal witness who was unavailable would have testified about.

Well, independent of that, I'm not sure what the point here is in reference to the testimony about the Windows event log not happening. Your guy was found guilty after only about 1.5 days of deliberations without that even more damning testimony. Were you hoping for something even faster than...

Seems like you answered your own question. The prosecution wasted a bunch of the jurors' time calling witness after witness that either repeated the same things over and over (that NC said that BC was an a-hole) or said that they knew nothing at all. Maybe the judge (in a rare anti-prosecution...

I thought that the prosecution decided not to present it because the CF was unavailable to testify Mon and the judge had said that rebuttal witnesses could not be called out of order (whatever that means). At least some of the jurors had already protested their time being wasted, so what was...

I've asked this before but no one seems to answer. JW, under oath, said that the Google open/closed hand cursor files in the TIF would be .cur files rather than .bmp files. It took me about 5 minutes to determine that he was wrong about that. The other "expert" who didn't get to testify...

I may be mistaken, but I didn't think that Howie would do the appeal. An appellate attorney will do that. If I heard the judge's comments correctly yesterday, he said that he would submit whatever is required for BC to be assigned an appellate attorney

Apparently he wasn't since he didn't know the difference between a .cur file and a .bmp file.

Well, it seems that everyone is writing their going away messages, so I'll get in on some of that. I posted back on 4/2 that BC was going to be found guilty and that I had no doubt. I still think by week 2 or 3, the jury had mostly made up their mind and that the defense needed to pull a...

Right, and as I said, both sides did it. The prosecution did it with all of the nonsense about national security and child *advertiser censored* buster, etc, over the FBI output of the FAT. The defense did it with all of the nonsense about people breaking into the WiFi network and the laptop and the vast...

Yeah, it's really the same thing that the lawyers [both sides] do. When stubborn facts start getting in the way, they try to create a whole bunch of confusion over something that really is irrelevant hoping that folks forget the original point in the chaos.

Apologies, but I'm not following the importance of this whole debate. If the Windows event log of his laptop showed a duplicate address error and the MAC address reported was that of some/any 3825, that means that he had that 3825 in his house at the time of the event (assuming that the laptop...

You are overvaluing the equipment. $11K would be the list price. Most customers don't pay list price. The actual cost of goods for the equipment is about 1/5 or so of what it actually sells for. So, the internal cost of the router is probably no more than $1500. If a Cisco engineer spent 3...

I'm not following the logic here. What would be the point in presenting it without the jury in the room? What is the value of the ruse if the jury doesn't hear it? Maybe Zell didn't notice that they weren't there?