Search results

Thank you! No longer confused. :) I was thinking all of these were from the brief. Duh!

This is the image I'm talking about. I get all of the other stuff about the light of her car but this throws me off. Not sure where it is heading or its point? Why would she use SAs car as an example if she's is trying to prove he didn't do it.

In here somewhere. They've added more stuff so I can't locate it at the mo,ent. Lol https://m.imgur.com/r/TickTockManitowoc/mG63n

Right. So why the recreation of SAs car and THs car colliding?

Thanks. I'm confused by the accident recreation drawing. Does that say SA hit THs cat? I don't know where that is going if the brief says RH hit a pole with her RAV4.

I would love to know if there were photos of a Firebird on her camera

Who does the Pontiac Grand Am belong to?

<modsnip> Why did they take it and then return it?

So what *do* you think happened in the bedroom?

Hmmm, so the vehicle was seized on 11/3 but then later discovered on the Avery lot on 11/5????? Say WHAT?!?

If it were me, I would file today. I wouldn't want to wait until the last minute.

Maybe I should rephrase....can you please tell me HOW TH was killed? In what manner? What weapon? What was the cause of death? Was she raped? What evidence is there of that? What evidence shows the manner in which she died? I'm not asking about planted evidence. I am asking YOU to back...

It's been a while since I've been here but can you point me to where it's been said what actually happened to TH? I mean, by actual evidence and not the story Kratz made up.

If EDTA is not found it could mean 1 of 2 things, 1) There was no EDTA in the blood sampled, or 2) It was just not found. Not finding something doesn't mean it didnt exist. IMO, it cannot be proven that there wasn't EDTA. It can only be proven there was.

Are there links to live streams?

It doesn't matter what you think. It only matters what they think. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I wasn't clear. I knew what I meant. It do t really come across. :) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It says FINAL opinions. That doesn't mean that the jurors can't go back and forth (internally) during the trial about what their opinion is in regards to whether JA received life or death. I'm sure many jurors go back and forth (in their own mind) throughout trials on their opinions but don't...

No where in my post did I mention discussions.

I never said anything about discussing it? :thinking: