Search results

I must respectfully disagree BeanE. The job of the defense IS to create reasonable doubt - within reason. The defense cannot and will not say that RK killed Caylee. But they are within their rights to defend their client by questioning the motives and past of RK. Do I believe it has any...

Counselor, please indulge me for a minute... If I state that I have heard the Lyon tape, and I find it offensive BUT I inform the court that I can put that aside and reach verdict based soley upon the evidence presented as it relates to the accused, I am doing my duty as a fair and impartial...

Snipped: Originally Posted by Leila If RK is a suspect.................how did the Anthony family know where to send their private investigator to search..........a month before the remains were found? IMO..............the Anthonys had the information on the general location of Caylee's...

What if the defense presents it's case, and then the state presents it's case (including LE's detailed investigation of RK), and he makes a determination to dismiss? Does this automatically create grounds for appeal just because the motion was dismissed? If JS dismisses, it will be because...

The defense is doing what the defense is supposed to do. Whether the motion is valid or not will be decided in court by Judge Strickland. But....JB and AL taking the road to promote these conspiracy theories borders on dirty-pool (aka jury tainting). However...there is slim chance of any...

No assumptions from where I sit. In reality, the defense is doing the only thing they can - muddy the waters. Is it right? No. But remember, they still only need one juror to question any one of the many things the defense will throw out there, and they will have done their job. Sad...really