Search results

I’m on the same page with the shoes - he told his mom he carried them home because his feet hurt which I instantly thought was a lie. I bet they were wet and that’s why he carried them.

I see a lot of Facebook posts about posts on Snapchat from the kids involved in her disappearance and murder. I don’t know anything about Snapchat so I haven’t actually seen them.

Yes…this is the one. I wondered why I was not seeing this anywhere else, and didn’t know if this was a reliable story or not. Then came here and didn’t see it either. Something really seems off - it’s probably not valid.

Sorry - I’m not sure why but it is not letting me “quote” - this is about the radaronline story I mentioned above. The article I read said they were withholding the name of the potential suspect - it doesn’t name Meyer in this article. It sounded to me like someone new.

I haven’t posted in ages, and I’m a little confused about the threads for this case - so not sure this is the best place to ask this but I’ll give it a try. Is ‘radaronline’ a reliable source? I see a story from yesterday about DNA and this case but I don’t see any discussion here about it...

I did as well.

I believe he said “five counts if First Degree Murder”.

Five counts of murder? I’m confused.

I didn’t sleep last night either. Kept thinking about the details over and over. And then...I got angry thinking about Chris Watts mother’s statement. She said something about “what happened”...and never said “what YOU did”. She still hasn’t accepted he DID this or is making him...

So they confirmed he was actively having an affair...has it been confirmed it was a woman? What do we know? There are way too many posts to follow and catch up.

Thank you. I am in Canada - we don’t have that here (thT I am aware of). I have heard the term before, I didn’t realize it meant a second Murder in the first degree charge tho.

I see nine charges...but why 5 murder charges if three people were murdered?

Why does it show FIVE charges - Murder in the first degree?

I posted a couple days ago that they would say SHE killed the girls...and then he killed her for what she did. And...here we are. I just finally was able to get online for updates tonight, and the second story I read was exactly that story. All it takes is ONE juror to fall for it and we...

Oh...I don’t think anyone would fall for it either...but I would bet the defence will try something to cast some doubt. They always do.

Exactly what i am thinking...going to claim she killed the girls...then he killed her out of anger for what she did.

Think back...remember the opening of the trial for Casey Anthony? First words...she was dead and Casey didn’t know what happened? Her father did it? Well....they could try the...Shannan killed the kids, she was abusive and no one knew....and then they fought and he killed Shannan out of...

I read through a lot of posts and didn’t see this raised yet...I apologize if I missed it. In the Court room video they were discussing tests being requested and the Prosecution stated something like...”on body parts we may not have”. Anyone know what that may mean? It sounded like the...

She didn’t tell a friend where to find the body...it was Kristys father that knew where the body was (allegedly). Maybe her father told the Police what he knew?