The airline has to provide an official letter to the passenger. United did not do that. Their fault for not playing by the rules and thinking they could get what they wanted using intimidation. Pathetic power trip.
It is the fault of the police for having used force. An aviation expert said on...
I haven't watched it and don't intend to do so. I want to say a couple of things:
1. Judge Perry talks about closure? How about the Judge not saying that there was absolutely enough evidence for a first degree murder conviction and then saying something different? I can't think of another case...
Let's say that United had done everything by the book (they did not) and the passenger still refused to give up the seat. What then? Which would have been less of a disaster? Beating the passenger up and then dealing with the public aftermath or facing a domino effect with regard to flights...
The airline company has the right to ask passengers to give up their seats but they have to provide an official letter and money (or a check) on the spot. United did not do that. I'm tired of people who seem to have nothing better to do than argue against the facts simply to have an alternative...
Yes, in that interview he seemed certain about there being enough evidence for murder one. Now it might have been an accident. I mean, if the Judge changes his opinion depending on which way the wind blows (yeah, he changes his mind AFTER learning about the fool-proof suffocation---what logic!)...
It was all over when they picked this particular jury. What disturbs me the most is how little time and effort they invested when it was time for deliberations---didn't even look at the evidence and certainly did not understand the instructions. I wouldn't even mind so much if they put in...
I agree with you a 100%. The fact that she was disorganized does not mean that she not intentionally murder Caylee! Why didn't Scott Peterson plan his alibi better (he said he went fishing but was clueless about the kind of bait used etc.)? He made several little and big mistakes but it doesn't...
I think many of the jurors had other plans and took the easy way out with the not-guilty verdict.
The prosecution could and should have done better especially with the fool-proof suffocation evidence. They should have broken down the entire day of the 15th and most importantly the 16th for the...
Sadly she was able to accuse her poor father of something so horrific because she was still allowed to live at home. She wouldn't have been able to accuse her father if she had lived on her own or with roommates. They tried to accommodate her mostly for Caylee's sake, I imagine, but it backfired...
Yes, she did use the term snot in reference to Caylee while texting her boyfriend. In that series of text messages she says things like "At least the kid is passed out" and then "want me to bring the little snot head?" What a terrible "mother" she was!
So strange how these criminals think...
Never in a million years will I ever believe George did anything nasty like the liar claims. However, hypothetically speaking, if any such thing had happened then it would mean Casey caused the reckless endangerment of Caylee by allowing her to live with her abusive grandfather. KC would still...
She says Caylee would be a bada$$. And she says Caylee would like rock music or something. How on earth would she know? I remember Casey saying in her jailhouse letters that she likes rock music. I guess this means Caylee would have grown up to like it too?! What a moronic thing to say. She...
Nothing like a petite young woman to make intelligent people ignore the evidence and look for the laziest and mildest explanation to excuse what she did, huh? There are some women who accidently overdose their children so of course let us include Casey in that group because she couldn't have...
I expected this. Zero remorse. Which mother whose child dies accidently says she sleeps well at night? What an inappropriate thing to say. She can't even try and appear to be a normal human being. Strickland was right when he said that the truth and Casey are strangers... it's still true after...
My goodness. This isn't an exercise in creative imagination where the unlikeliest of theories that do not match the evidence are listed out.
Fool-proof suffocation on the same day that Caylee dies is indicative of an accidental death? How is that ever reasonable? I can understand if the...
Didn't Perry say that there was sufficient evidence for murder one? One would have to ignore the search for fool-proof suffocation, the duct tape and Casey's behavior post-murder. It boggles the mind that this Judge would believe that this was an accident. It's just not reasonable. If Judge Stan...
What are the odds of a burglar being at the church at the same time as Missy and then deciding to murder her...and her husband just happens to be away that day? To me it sounds more improbable than other scenarios that have been put forth here. I tend to go with the family one because of some of...
Okay, then the father-in-law lived elsewhere. It is still a huge coincidence that the husband happened to be out of town during the murder. I think the father-in-law and husband were both vacationing albeit in different places. I feel that this was all planned well and much in advance.
We have...
Agree completely! What are the chances of BOTH the husband and the father-in-law being out of town during the murder? This is a red flag I cannot ignore. Add to this all the other things the husband has said. Hired hit indeed. I cannot wait for this case to be solved. Poor Missy.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.