Search results

I see what you mean. I would have to agree with Wiegert. Colborn not writing a report til 8 months later doesn't follow protocol one would believe. I would think that is important information to be written up immediately. Or to be recorded.

BBM. Did he initially say he didn't see her that day? I don't remember. Who did he say that to? Thanks.

Human remains or decomposition? What do they alert to then?

A cadaver dog, to my understanding, only hits on human remains or the smell. Tracking dogs only follow scents they are given to find and I haven't heard a tracking dog was used. If not, a real missed opportunity to see where she walked or if she was even in the trailer.

Was TH's DNA found on the driver's door handle? Or anywhere on the exterior of the RAV 4 or her finger prints? I assume they would have had her prints from her home at least.

And, it doesn't appear they used tracking dogs to find her scent to see if she even was in or walked into the trailer. Cadaver dogs, yes.

And what about using those little evidence flags? True, there were a lot of small bones, but put flags up on most, especially those that were outside the pit. Then take pictures. But no pictures, no coroner = suspicious.

BBM. The gear shift?

I asked this question here last night wondering if EDTA could now be found in blood. And usually forensic evidence covers blood or DNA or ballistics......I certainly don't know what new advances have been made since 2005-2007. Ten years is a long time. Any more ideas at what she could be hinting?

Is it possible to detect ETDA in blood samples now? In 2016? I have no idea. Could that be one thing Zellner might be referring to when she says forensic testing has advanced? Any ideas on what she could mean?

Was there testimony or evidence or a mention of using dogs to retrace TH's steps on the Avery property? To see if she went into the trailer or garage?

Absolutely agree.

Thanks. Would you have any idea when this video was done?

I haven't had time to read the transcripts. I started on Barry's testimony. I believe they were asking him if he didn't hear the message machine recording the message and he said, no, he was asleep. Was there testimony that someone confirmed the message from TH? Or that Steven heard the message...

Regarding the *67 calls, was there any testimony Steven received the message from the message machine? BJ was at work (correct me if I am wrong) and Barry was asleep. The message went to BJ's machine in her residence. If he didn't receive the message, maybe that's why he called her the first...

You mean premeditation? I answered a post asking how long did Avery have to clean up his trail and I said basically, he didn't do a very good job. He even left the key in his night table. Of course Steven was reported to have an IQ of 70. And, FWIW, I don't know if Steven killed this young...

I guess it would have been all night on the 3rd although I have read Earl (not sure if correct name) stayed on the property while the family was gone. What do you think he cleaned up? If I remember correctly there was no DNA of Teresa's found anywhere in the trailer or garage except a bullet...

Thank you for the link. Very informative. The thing that has concerned me, not knowing the timeline very well has been answered. Steven left on the 4th and the hard evidence was found on the 5th. If he did this, he must have known LE would find the car and the bones. If he didn't do it, he...

I asked this question here and another poster kindly answered that it was the 5th of November the Avery's left the property for 8 days. Now, I don't remember what time the police actually asked them to leave or whether it was the night before or that day or what time they left. I am not even...

Trying to hide a car with branches and a big piece of metal, why would the cover on the back not be removed? Big letters RAV4. Much easier to notice. And why was Strum given a camera. If she saw something, couldn't she just have notified?