Search results

JonBenet wore one ponytail at the top of her head to the White's party. This was the same hairstyle (of which there are photos) at her family's Christmas party on the 23rd. Her body, when it was found had a second ponytail tied lower down and underneath the original top of the head ponytail.

Since Dr Phil is a psychologist he might not ask questions to do with what happened wrt to the murder specifically, I would expect him to ask questions centred around how the murder and the investigation plus all the media attention affected him and the family. Also the dreadful illness his...

Re the surgical gloves – I don’t know what you mean about surgical gloves being re-used during the autopsy. The coroner would not have used non-sterile gloves if that’s what you mean and if that is what you think then I really don’t know where you got that idea from because I doubt very much...

UK Guy, Just replying to your comment about amylase being present in other body fluids. Sure it is and forensic scientists are well aware of this fact and to overcome this problem have developed more advanced tests that can test specifically for the type of amylase present in saliva. So even if...

Andreww, can you please direct me to where you got this "artificially enhanced" term from? It is not a term that is normally used by molecular biologists when referring to PCR and other techniques used in obtaining DNA profiles so I suspect this term came from someone who is not a scientist...

UKGuy, an amylase test was performed on the spot of JonBenet’s blood on her panties and that showed up positive. This positive result indicated the presence of amylase. From that researchers concluded there must have been saliva mixed in with the blood in the bloodspot since only saliva has...

SuperDave, while there need to be 13 markers for acceptance into the FBI Offender database, only 10 markers are needed to get a sample accepted into the Forensic (crime scene) database. Being the prolific writer that you are on the subject, I am really surprised that you do not seem to be aware...

Fides, I posted the emails mainly to alert otg to the fact that Dr Rorke says she has never met or spoken to James Kolar, which otg was wondering about in his post #59 that I was answering. At first I did think the emails suggested that Dr Rorke saw no evidence of 'brain swelling or...

Hi AK, you probably don't care one way or the other but if you are saying that Dr Rorke's description of the head blow seemed like a description of a generic head blow and not what happened in the case JonBenet's head blow, which was associated with a strangulation event then I agree with you...

Also otg, it would appear Dr Rorke was not consulted by Meyer or that she had ever spoken with Kolar - I'm quoting a March 31 2013 post here by Brothermoon, which I hope is OK "I sent a letter to Dr. Rorke asking for a comment on the disrepancy in Kolar's book pertaining to his quote of her...

I have similar thoughts to you otg. I'd just like to add that, since Dr Rorke did actually testify before the grand jury, that she would have made it a point to study the autopsy material in detail. So she must have made sure she read the whole report and viewed all the photos and whatever...

Thanks for your reply Olivia. This whole business about the evidence of Dr Rorke is very strange. The first time I had ever heard of her involvement in the case was from the 2012 Kolar book and until a couple of days ago I didn't realise she had ever testified at the grand jury, I thought the...

Please questfortrue - if you have a link for that one sentence comment in a newspaper mentioning Rorke testifying during the GJ could you post it here. Or if you don't have a link can you please post whatever further information you do have. Thanks

Does this qualify as a factual and reasonable scenario?

just quoting Tricia here: "The days of allowing anyone to post anything because it's part of their "theory" are gone." and wondering why this post is 'allowed'

SuperDave - you stated in your post #157 "It's not disinformation to say the other DNA was not fresh. That's what the Cellmark Labs tech told the police." AK disputed this statement of yours asking you to provide proof Your reply to him in no way came anywhere near providing any truth...

SuperDave - you stated in your post #157 "It's not disinformation to say the other DNA was not fresh. That's what the Cellmark Labs tech told the police." AK disputed this statement of yours asking you to provide proof Your reply to him in no way came anywhere near providing any truth to your...

Thanks for that AK, I couldn't quite remember where that claim originated but I knew is was not directly from Meyer. So it was only Arndt paraphrasing what she thought Meyer had said. (edit) Actually no, it was Byfield paraphrasing what he thought Arndt had said who was paraphrasing what she...

reply deleted

reply deleted