If EH sill has all this evidence, then why not march it straight around to a police station and have them do a proper investigation into it? That gets AH a second bite at the cherry but she'd have to have her and her friends go through questions from seasoned detectives and I doubt AH would...
If she had such proof, then why didn't she take her claims through the criminal courts? I'd suggest the reason would be because her hoax would have been discovered much quicker and her and her friends would've been facing jail time. There wouldn't have been any option to not turn over their...
I always thought that it was very much the elephant in the room that nobody was going to talk about. I also thought it might be the reason behind her aggressiveness, in that she can't come to terms with what her true identity is.
I didn't catch the start of where Nate came onto the channel, but I thought that it seemed as if they were taking them question by question and not as a whole.
Rekeita Law have somebody on who ran a mock jury last night and JD won on Q1, lost on Q's 2 & 3 and AH lost on all. They're also showing a poll where there are a few thousand responses and AH seems to be winning on some of the statements from the WP article.
I believe Depp and have personal experience of it. The mother of my grandson abused my son and continues to harass him to this day. She's thrown a pot of hot water over him (luckily it wasn't boiling), whacked his head with a drawer front, threatened to drive herself and my grandson into a...
There's no live updates about jury observations as they're having to tweet them when there are breaks as they're not allowed to tweet live from the courtroom.
If AH's side are claiming the op-ed was a 1st amendment issue, then that would also mean that her counterclaim sinks as that would mean AW's statements in the Daily Mail are 1st amendment rights too. It would also mean that there can never, ever be any defamation if something is printed in a...
The rapid change when she's confronted with her lies and ability to then make people believe her version of truth is astonishing. I don't think I've ever seen anybody so devious enough to do it in a televised trial.
I'm still wondering if there's a Marilyn Manson bombshell to come soon. The AH team made an attempt on virtually every one of her witnesses to make sure he made it into the record. Now, either her team are representing one of his accusers, or they're planning to weave it into their closing...
The psychiatrist today said that JD had memory problems (due to his drug abuse)> My own opinion is that AH knew this and would tell him after a binge, that he'd hit her. I think he started to believe it and that's why he mentioned a 'monster' inside him. He does have a rage problem, but I...
I remember that part of the testimony and thought that JD should be able to prove the receipts. I suppose the double edged sword of that would be, if he did produce them, then that could point to him holding the financial upper hand. I do wonder where the receipts were for the damage that JD's...
From Reikieta Law video. They think (Law & Lumber is there too) that if a preponderance of the evidence shows that AH gave a false statement,they can find that she acted with malice as she would have known it wasn't true.
We have to be careful in what we hope for though. She could be a terrible witness and could end up giving ammunition to AH's side. I hope not, but is there a reason she wasn't called as a witness for Depp in the first place or was she always going to be kept for rebuttal?
The blusher that AH is wearing is doing her any favours as it makes her look as if she's scraped her face on something. Makes it look like she knows exactly how to use special effects cosmetics.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.