Can someone, wiser than me, explain this, please. The law worked. By their own account, the videos virtually disappeared. Isn't that the desired effect? So, now we can look forward to more animal snuff films. I have a hard time believing that "free speech activists" were the ones cheering the loudest. I'm so darned pleased.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100420...DeW5fdG9wX3N0b3JpZXMEc2xrA2NvdXJ0dm9pZHNsYQ--
Court voids law aimed at animal cruelty videos
"The Supreme Court struck down a federal law Tuesday aimed at banning videos that show graphic violence against animals, saying it violates the right to free speech.
The justices, voting 8-1, threw out the criminal conviction of Robert Stevens of Pittsville, Va., who was sentenced to three years in prison for videos he made about pit bull fights.
The law was enacted in 1999 to limit Internet sales of so-called crush videos, which appeal to a certain sexual fetish by showing women crushing to death small animals with their bare feet or high-heeled shoes.
The videos virtually disappeared once the measure became law, the government argued.....
and
"Animal rights groups, including the Humane Society of the United States and the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, and 26 states joined the Obama administration in support of the law. The government sought a ruling that treated videos showing animal cruelty like child *advertiser censored*, not entitled to constitutional protection...."
and
"But Roberts said the law could be read to allow the prosecution of the producers of films about hunting. And he scoffed at the administration's assurances that it would only apply the law to depictions of extreme cruelty...."
more at link
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100420...DeW5fdG9wX3N0b3JpZXMEc2xrA2NvdXJ0dm9pZHNsYQ--
Court voids law aimed at animal cruelty videos
"The Supreme Court struck down a federal law Tuesday aimed at banning videos that show graphic violence against animals, saying it violates the right to free speech.
The justices, voting 8-1, threw out the criminal conviction of Robert Stevens of Pittsville, Va., who was sentenced to three years in prison for videos he made about pit bull fights.
The law was enacted in 1999 to limit Internet sales of so-called crush videos, which appeal to a certain sexual fetish by showing women crushing to death small animals with their bare feet or high-heeled shoes.
The videos virtually disappeared once the measure became law, the government argued.....
and
"Animal rights groups, including the Humane Society of the United States and the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, and 26 states joined the Obama administration in support of the law. The government sought a ruling that treated videos showing animal cruelty like child *advertiser censored*, not entitled to constitutional protection...."
and
"But Roberts said the law could be read to allow the prosecution of the producers of films about hunting. And he scoffed at the administration's assurances that it would only apply the law to depictions of extreme cruelty...."
more at link