TX - Hailey Dunn, 13, Colorado City, 27 Dec 2010 - #22

Status
Not open for further replies.

imamaze

Former Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
21,126
Reaction score
299
Hailey20Dunn-120lr.gif


Hailey is 13 years old. She was heading to stay with a friend on Monday Dec. 27th but never made it. She is 5'1" with hazel eyes and brown hair. She also has pierced ears. She was last seen at 1804 Chestnut, wearing navy blue sweat pants, a light colored T-shirt and pink and white shoes.
Anyone who has seen Hailey contact the Colorado City Police Dept. at 325-128-5294

Thread #1
Thread #2
Thread #3
Thread #4
Thread #5
Thread #6
Thread #7
Thread #8
Thread #9
Thread #10
Thread #11
Thread #12
Thread #13
Thread #14
Thread #15
Thread #16
Thread #17
Thread #18
Thread #19
Thread #20
Thread #21

Media Links

You must read this post and hit the 'thanks' button before you post in this thread.
We do not allow rumors to be posted or perpetuated at WS. No bashing Law Enforcement. Do not post a rumor or respond to a rumor.
Direct quotes and screenshots from social networking sites are not allowed at WS.
You may discuss what is on a social networking site but must include the link. However, do not discuss or link to sites that are private.
Please do not post about other posters. That is a TOS violation because it is rude. It’s like talking behind someone’s back.
The only appropriate way to respond to problematic posts is to hit the alert button. We will then look at the post and handle it asap. Do not respond to a problematic post. That compounds the problem and delays the solution.
We do not allow the posting of personal information about people who have not been named as a POI or suspect by LE or MSM.
You must include a link to where you found the information in your post.
Just because a person is connected to a case doesn't mean we can immediately start using his/her name, even if it is an adult. There is no need to drag innocent people through the mud.
If people start talking to the media about the case then yes, they have decided they want their identity known. Then you can use their names in posts here at WS.
If suspects and family members are talked about in the major media outlets, you can use their names in posts here at WS.
We don't allow name posting of minors’ names, except for Hailey's, of course.
The full WS TOS and "rules" can be found here: The Rules

'Insiders' or "Locals"
Before you post ANY inside information that could help this case PLEASE report it to the police first. Here at Websleuths, we don't care about having "scoops" or "bombshells." We care about the cases, the people involved, and making sure Websleuths is not hindering the investigation by allowing people to post inside information that the police do not have yet.
If you know Hailey or her family and want to post about her, then WS admin needs to talk to you. Please email wsverify@xmission.com
Include:
The case
Your Websleuths name
Your phone number and a good time to call
Your real name.
In the subject line please put which case you are asking to be verified on.
It will all be kept strictly confidential.
Unless what you are saying can be verified by law enforcement and/or the media, it is not considered a "fact" here. You may personally know for 100% certainty that it is true, but unless you are verified and/or can back it up with a link, we do have to consider it to be a rumor. This is not to single anyone out or to ignore information, but to maintain the integrity of a case and keep the best interests of the victims at the forefront.
Please do what is right by the case first before you post anything on Websleuths.
Do not post about private conversations with case players unless the case player is aware that the conversation is going public.
If you are a local or insider and your posts do not include any "inside" information, you do not need to be verified. Please remember, however, that information as simple as what Mom does for a living or where BF works are considered inside information.

Check for professional and locals here...
Professional Posters & Verified Locals/Insiders


Please Continue here...
 
I can bet when that car was returned to BD there was more on it than there were when they took it, if you get my drift.
 
BD doesn't have a driver's license, right? The affidavit showed her having a Texas ID and SA having a Texas DL. I'm guessing every LE officer from Colorado City, to Dunn to Big Springs knows this by now.
 
i know some folks that have major stereo systems in their cars always have electrical tape for those reasons. electrical tape is not a super strong tape like duct tape... i dont think it would be the tape of choice for any of the possible reasons we might be thinking he would need tape for...jmho
 
I wonder if she could not get her DL renewed because she could not show proof of insurance?
 
BD doesn't have a driver's license, right? The affidavit showed her having a Texas ID and SA having a Texas DL. I'm guessing every LE officer from Colorado City, to Dunn to Big Springs knows this by now.


Anyone know why she doesn't have a driver's license? Why would someone own a car but doesn't have a DL?
 
I think they had plenty of time to remove anything from the car that they wanted to hide, before it was taken away by LE, unless of course, there are hairs, fibers, etc. in the trunk which should not be there.
 
BD doesn't have a driver's license, right? The affidavit showed her having a Texas ID and SA having a Texas DL. I'm guessing every LE officer from Colorado City, to Dunn to Big Springs knows this by now.

The affidavits list a DL number and Texas ID number for both Dunn and Adkins. I'd link you but I saved them to my hard drive. The are on bigcountry.com though.
 
BD doesn't have a driver's license, right? The affidavit showed her having a Texas ID and SA having a Texas DL. I'm guessing every LE officer from Colorado City, to Dunn to Big Springs knows this by now.

IIRC it showed she has both ID and DL
 
Sorry what is going on about the car?

It was just returned to Billie, apparently. Found 2 rolls of electrical tape, misc. papers, trace evidence was collected.
 
LE gave back the car ? That means they must not have found too much of interest. I don't find it odd at all that there is electrical tape (esp in an older car). If they felt anything in that car was used to harm or transport Hailey I don't think they would have returned it and I'm certain they likely used HRD dogs to sniff it over.
 
Now that SA is officially a suspect, maybe that will rattle the trees a bit and shake out a few leaves of truth. A person should be easier to find. It makes you want to inject your kids with a homing beacon for safety! What is WRONG with people--waaaaaaay to many cases out there!!
 
Could SA have wanted to share what he did or what he was about to do with a co-worker? Perhaps he went to work to pick up someone and take them back to the house? Possible explanation as to why he went into work only to turn around and go back to the house. Wonder if LE checked to see if anyone else from SA's company was unaccounted for during that time.
 
Does anyone know if any members have a case archive going for Hailey?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
124
Guests online
881
Total visitors
1,005

Forum statistics

Threads
589,928
Messages
17,927,785
Members
228,003
Latest member
Knovah
Back
Top