An odd story. What was he thinking?
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/01/morphed-child-*advertiser censored*/
Parents Sue Expert Witness Who Made Fake Child-*advertiser censored* of Their Kids
"An Ohio lawyer who serves as an expert witness in child *advertiser censored* cases might be on the hook for hundreds of thousands of dollars in civil damages for Photoshopping courtroom exhibits of children having sex.
Attorney Dean Boland purchased innocent pictures of four juvenile girls from a Canadian stock-image website, and then digitally modified them to make it appear as if the children were engaged in sexual conduct. Boland was an expert witness for the defense in half-a-dozen child *advertiser censored* cases, and he made the mock-ups to punctuate his argument that child *advertiser censored* laws are unconstitutionally overbroad because they could be applied to faked photos...."
and
"....The parents learned of the photo morphing from the FBI, according to the girls attorney. Theyre suing over Boland transforming a picture of a 5-year-old girl eating a doghnut into one of her having oral sex. Another photo was of a 6-year-old girls face placed on the body of an adult woman having sex with two men...."
more at link
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/01/morphed-child-*advertiser censored*/
Parents Sue Expert Witness Who Made Fake Child-*advertiser censored* of Their Kids
"An Ohio lawyer who serves as an expert witness in child *advertiser censored* cases might be on the hook for hundreds of thousands of dollars in civil damages for Photoshopping courtroom exhibits of children having sex.
Attorney Dean Boland purchased innocent pictures of four juvenile girls from a Canadian stock-image website, and then digitally modified them to make it appear as if the children were engaged in sexual conduct. Boland was an expert witness for the defense in half-a-dozen child *advertiser censored* cases, and he made the mock-ups to punctuate his argument that child *advertiser censored* laws are unconstitutionally overbroad because they could be applied to faked photos...."
and
"....The parents learned of the photo morphing from the FBI, according to the girls attorney. Theyre suing over Boland transforming a picture of a 5-year-old girl eating a doghnut into one of her having oral sex. Another photo was of a 6-year-old girls face placed on the body of an adult woman having sex with two men...."
more at link