GUILTY UK - Joanne Fraill, juror, for contempt of court, Manchester, 2010

...why would she EVER have thought that was smart? it didnt occur to her there was a reason the defendant was not part of the deliberation process? beggars belief.
 
Oh.
My.
Goodness.

I really did not think there was anyone on the planet who would think this was ok! It is obvious the juror was very sympathetic to the defendant.....but her decision to make contact during the deliberations boggles the mind. I don't think the juror meant any harm, but it is hard to believe she didn't know that contacting the defendant was wrong, wrong, wrong. :waitasec:
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
192
Guests online
1,837
Total visitors
2,029

Forum statistics

Threads
593,757
Messages
17,992,063
Members
229,232
Latest member
combszola
Back
Top