It has been brought up in some threads that perhaps there was jury tampering in this case.
For me at this point it is the only thing that makes sense. The more I hear the few jurors talk the more it makes sense. The juror that quit her job and left her husband and home? how could she afford to do that?
JB shooting at the camera in the hallway before the verdict made me scratch my head. Considering all the antics we've witnessed JB doing all these 3yrs would this surprise anyone at this point?
What other evidence do we have to start a possible investigation?

Here is a link to a legal definition of jury tampering:

(i know I may be grasping a straws but "it does not make sense!" mods I searched this forum on topic and found none)