I carefully read the law pertaining to internet discussions on boards and in chat, and it was determined it was conversation and opinion which is protected under freedom of speech. It's at the bottom of one of the court papers on a candy rose, pertains to this case, the Jonbenet murder and the internet discussions. We are not posting a site, such as the MANY available stating PATSY DID IT, BURKE DID IT, those can be handled differently. However, if we witnessed a crime or had any of this information first hand, and deliberately lied in print to make someone look guilty when we knew they weren't, we could fall into some libel issue. We are discussing information that we have read , either in books, mags, tabloids, and info we have heard, via tv ,radio, nothing is off limits. I wish Burke were off limits, but no, he isn't as is no one else, including Chris Wolf who has not been cleared. John , Patsy, Santa, Fleet, Burke, Melinda, JAR, Wolfe, have all been cleared for matching dna. I would like to believe that clears them, but LE wants to say this isn't a dna case, so then that leaves us with "no one " has been cleared.
Bill McReynold's was cleared on dna, yet he seemed to be Keenan's choice the last I heard. This is obviously my opinion, and according to the decision I read, I don't have to say it over and over like someone with ocd . Again, aren't 'internet posters suppose to be collectively ocd? imo