Allison Baden-Clay - GENERAL DISCUSSION THREAD #32

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
S

SoSueMe

Former Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Messages
8,119
Reaction score
41
Thank you for joining Websleuths! :welcome3:​


Please remember the following when discussing the Allison Baden-Clay case:
Websleuths is a moderated forum. We strive to discuss cases in a friendly environment. ​

Our rules can be reviewed here: The Rules (PLEASE make sure you know the rules!)


Currently, we are considering Allison's husband to be a suspected person of interest in this case. There is a possible second party involved per MSM and it is okay to discuss that aspect, but please refrain from accusing anyone of murder at this juncture. Speculating is one thing, accusing is another.


Thread 1

Thread 2
Thread 3
Thread 4

Thread 5

Thread 6

Thread 7

Thread 8

Thread 9

Thread 10

Thread 11

Thread 12

Thread 13

Thread 14
Thread 15

Thread 16

Thread 17

Thread 18

Thread 19

Thread 20

Thread 21
Thread 22

Thread 23

Thread 24

Thread 25

Thread 26

Thread 27

Thread 28

Thread 29

Thread 30



REMEMBER: No cutting and pasting of comments from other social or media websites. You may paraphrase and provide a link.

The only social media sites allowed are those belonging to the victim, Gerard Baden-Clay and any named (by law enforcement) POI or Suspect, or site created and devoted to the murder of Allison.


Media/Timeline Reference Thread: CLICK HERE



CHAT ROOM: not for case discussion!
 
119498958977780800stop_sign_right_font_mig_.svg.med.png


Have you read the previous post? If not, it them now.
By posting on this thread, you are stating you know the rules!​
 
imamaze said:
A list of our verified posters can be found here...

Verified Professional Posters
If your not on our list and would like to be verified please contact Admin at the address below, its all confidential.
If you do not wish to be identified as an expert in a certain area, we ask that you refrain from answering questions that are specifically directed to those that have been verified as specialist in their area and that you do not claim to be a professional in any area.
If a member posts with "expertise" please check to make sure they are on this list. If not, please do not take their post as professional information, but rather just as another opinion ;much as you would with any member of the general posting membership.

If a member wants to post as a professional ( a lawyer, shrink, and so on) or as an insider who knows the people involved then they must email us at the following email.
wsverify@xmission.com
Please include:
The case
Their Websleuths name
Their phone number and a good time to call
Their real name.
In the subject line please put which case they are asking to be verified on.
All info will be kept strictly confidential
Thank you!
Click to expand...

ANYONE who posts facts and IS NOT a verified professional MUST POST A LINK TO VERIFY THE INFORMATION!

Any post without this procedure will result in the post being removed without explanation and repeated violations could result in a loss of posting privileges.
 
We have a detailed, formal Terms of Service (TOS) posted separately, and that TOS is what you will be held to as a member here. It's long and detailed because it has to be in the world we live in, and you are expected to read it, understand it and abide by it. However, we can sum it up as follows:

1) Be a decent human being;
2) Treat your fellow posters as the decent human beings they are;
3) Keep in mind that whatever you post will likely live on forever, so think before you press "Submit Reply".
4) It's a big world. People will disagree with you. You will disagree with them. This can be done with respect, and that's what we expect.
progress.gif

Please continue here...
 
so this morning GBC will appear via video link and hear that he has been charged - is that what this 'mention' is ?
 
BJsleuth said:
I think Dr Watson mentioned Ugly Creek or was it prior to that?
Click to expand...

Yup - I mentioned Ugly Creek, as well as the possibility that she was washed down to her final position. You may recall the post where I mentioned that sharp bend that Kholo Creek takes just before the bridge, and that an object such as a body would have been washed to the outside radius of that bend - which is the side of the creek Allison was found.

If she had been dropped off the bridge, despite the fact that she was either unconscious or dead, I would expect there to have been at least a few broken bones showing up on the XRays and CT scans. It would be feasible that she may have landed in the water if the tide was high, or into soft mud, and being totally relaxed (like a drunk who falls over and doesn't break anything) there could be no broken bones.

But as as already been said by those who went there, that is a decent drop and from the bodies and patients I've seen who have had similar falls, there have been broken arms or legs, neck, spine, and pelvis. And of course skull if landing head first or horizontal then the head slams back.

But - with soft ground or water, it would be possible for there to have been no fractures.

But I'm still in the "washed down to her final position" camp.
 
Maigret said:
so this morning GBC will appear via video link and hear that he has been charged - is that what this 'mention' is ?
Click to expand...

Pretty much. Also, the magistrate will establish if there is enough to continue with the case against him. IMO.
 
A truly heartfelt thanks to the people to make websleuths possible and for all the extra help they give to us posters in going the extra mile to accomodate all our aussie eccentricities and for recognising the benefit of the good that comes from posters telling their stories of their wonderful and sometimes not so wonderful life experiences. It makes the world a smaller place and allows us to reach out to friends everywhere!

Thanks Sosueme, SummerBreeze, Kimster and all the others that have helped us steer along in our journey for justice for Allison!

I know I am humbled and grateful to be able to post amongst such a warm and giving bunch of people!

:sunshine:
 
I'm outside the magistrates court. No real hope of anything new. Just want to get a personal feel for the court system.
 
Nads said:
I'm outside the magistrates court. No real hope of anything new. Just want to get a personal feel for the court system.
Click to expand...

Thanks! This case in Court 18 @ 9:00 (apparently).
 
DrWatson said:
Yup - I mentioned Ugly Creek, as well as the possibility that she was washed down to her final position. You may recall the post where I mentioned that sharp bend that Kholo Creek takes just before the bridge, and that an object such as a body would have been washed to the outside radius of that bend - which is the side of the creek Allison was found.

If she had been dropped off the bridge, despite the fact that she was either unconscious or dead, I would expect there to have been at least a few broken bones showing up on the XRays and CT scans. It would be feasible that she may have landed in the water if the tide was high, or into soft mud, and being totally relaxed (like a drunk who falls over and doesn't break anything) there could be no broken bones.

But as as already been said by those who went there, that is a decent drop and from the bodies and patients I've seen who have had similar falls, there have been broken arms or legs, neck, spine, and pelvis. And of course skull if landing head first or horizontal then the head slams back.

But - with soft ground or water, it would be possible for there to have no fractures.

But I'm still in the "washed down to her final position" camp.
Click to expand...

Doc, this was my thought yesterday when initally we believed her body to be found higher up (the high tide threw us off at first) its maybe a couple of metres only at the start of bridge and I said just what you did, drunks go all floppy and as a result don't get hurt as much! But after a lengthy discussion, it seemed that, unless she was rolled off close. To the road part/start of bridge, the distance quiclky becomes 5(maybe) or 6 metres, and you would think definite broken bones
 
I don't know which thread to go to...Aaahhh...
Shall I twitter here?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 78 more.
Total: 3,757 (members: 79, guests: 3,678)

Online statistics

Members online
79
Guests online
3,678
Total visitors
3,757
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
591,528
Messages
17,953,919
Members
228,522
Latest member
Cabinsleuth
Back
Top