Just thought I would add the latest information on the Gowns status.
I was listening to Tricia's interview, where Steve Thomas and James Kolar were answering questions.
James Kolar stated that what allowed him to come to a different conclusion from that of Steve Thomas or the then current DA, i.e. IDI, was that there was multiple samples of foreign touch-dna found on JonBenet's person.
So if one sample of touch-dna found in JonBenet's underwear allowed you to assume there was an intruder then surely multiple samples of touch-dna would allow you to assume more than one intruder was pesent when JonBenet was killed?
The latter conclusion Kolar thought conflicted with an absence of forensic evidence elsewhere at the crime-scene.
On the subject of the Pink Barbie Nightgown, he stated that the Gown had both Patsy's and Burke Ramsey's touch-dna on it.
Now given the prevailing wisdom regarding the Gown, i.e. it arrived in the wine-cellar via statically clinging to the White Blanket in the washing machine?
So the Gown has presumably been washed then stuck to the White blanket, i.e. no intermediate contact, so how come Burke Ramsey's touch-dna has arrived on the Gown?
Then there is the bloodstain on the Gown, sourced by DNA to JonBenet, again how come after JonBenet has been cleaned up, redressed etc, does blood arrive on the gown, because JonBenet is now dressed and wrapped in the White blanket?
I have always thought the static cling theory, to be just that, and with the latest evidence regarding Patsy and Burke Ramsey's touch-dna, its time for it to be discontinued.
As an aside James Kolar also confirmed that after JonBenet's death both Patsy and Burke Ramsey were prescribed some form of medication.
.
I was listening to Tricia's interview, where Steve Thomas and James Kolar were answering questions.
James Kolar stated that what allowed him to come to a different conclusion from that of Steve Thomas or the then current DA, i.e. IDI, was that there was multiple samples of foreign touch-dna found on JonBenet's person.
So if one sample of touch-dna found in JonBenet's underwear allowed you to assume there was an intruder then surely multiple samples of touch-dna would allow you to assume more than one intruder was pesent when JonBenet was killed?
The latter conclusion Kolar thought conflicted with an absence of forensic evidence elsewhere at the crime-scene.
On the subject of the Pink Barbie Nightgown, he stated that the Gown had both Patsy's and Burke Ramsey's touch-dna on it.
Now given the prevailing wisdom regarding the Gown, i.e. it arrived in the wine-cellar via statically clinging to the White Blanket in the washing machine?
So the Gown has presumably been washed then stuck to the White blanket, i.e. no intermediate contact, so how come Burke Ramsey's touch-dna has arrived on the Gown?
Then there is the bloodstain on the Gown, sourced by DNA to JonBenet, again how come after JonBenet has been cleaned up, redressed etc, does blood arrive on the gown, because JonBenet is now dressed and wrapped in the White blanket?
I have always thought the static cling theory, to be just that, and with the latest evidence regarding Patsy and Burke Ramsey's touch-dna, its time for it to be discontinued.
As an aside James Kolar also confirmed that after JonBenet's death both Patsy and Burke Ramsey were prescribed some form of medication.
.