710 users online (102 members and 608 guests)  




Page 11 of 13 FirstFirst ... 9 10 11 12 13 LastLast
Results 151 to 165 of 181
  1. #151
    Lady of the nightGuest
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Anderson View Post
    Fluke You said it.
    Hackett. He said it under oath.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  2. #152
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Noo Yawk City
    Posts
    203
    Quote Originally Posted by Lady of the night View Post
    Hackett. He said it under oath.
    He may very well have said it. Without the depositions it's hard to respond. But Joe Jr. mentioned the marsh as well.

  3. #153
    Lady of the nightGuest

    Court

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Anderson View Post
    He may very well have said it. Without the depositions it's hard to respond. But Joe Jr. mentioned the marsh as well.
    I know that doesn't prove anything to you, but I do know it to be a fact.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #154
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Noo Yawk City
    Posts
    203
    Quote Originally Posted by Lady of the night View Post
    Well, I've seen the depositions. I know that doesn't prove anything to you, but I do know it to be a fact.
    I'm not saying you are wrong - far from it. But the selective "leak" of depositions itself is an issue. Why do I say that? What if only the depositions that favor the Hackett theory have been shown only to people that are inclined to believe it? I am not saying I know that to be the case, simply that it raises that question.

  5. #155
    Lady of the nightGuest

    Court

    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Anderson View Post
    I'm not saying you are wrong - far from it. But the selective "leak" of depositions itself is an issue. Why do I say that? What if only the depositions that favor the Hackett theory have been shown only to people that are inclined to believe it? I am not saying I know that to be the case, simply that it raises that question.
    I'm not sure what other depositions there would be. If he's on video and he says something, what does that mean?

    Are you saying a full length video deposition could be altered to only include things that support a CPH theory?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  6. #156
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    661
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Anderson View Post
    He may very well have said it. Without the depositions it's hard to respond. But Joe Jr. mentioned the marsh as well.
    Fluke had a lot of it right. Maybe his presentation was a bit off but he tried to tell what was happening at oak beach and not many listened.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

  7. #157
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    137

    Summary Judgement

    The Summary Judgment motion was brought by Hackett in June, 2016. This means Hackett believes he has irrefutable evidence of his innocence against Ray's claim and he wants judge to rule in his favor.


    Keep in mind that during discovery phase of the litigation John Ray had a legal obligation to provide Hackett with Mari's phone records.


    I'm no expert on litigation -- but this doesn't look good for Ray. No wonder he's desperate to find anything on Hackett.

  8. #158
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    661
    I never felt hackett killed these girls. I believe he was set up. Just my 2 cents.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

  9. #159
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    137
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Anderson View Post
    I'm not saying you are wrong - far from it. But the selective "leak" of depositions itself is an issue. Why do I say that? What if only the depositions that favor the Hackett theory have been shown only to people that are inclined to believe it? I am not saying I know that to be the case, simply that it raises that question.
    There is no "leak" of depositions. They are at the court house. the court house is public. The file is public.

    No "leaks"

  10. #160
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    137

    Impeachment of Hackett

    Upon reading up on the depositions, I can tell all of you

    that when Hackett gets on the stand, John Ray will tear him apart
    and impeach him

    again and again and again. There are written depositions, as well as video.

    Hackett will be found guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt.

    Originally I did not have a lot of faith in JR, now upon reading these court documents
    and making notes
    and cross referencing them, Hackett's going to be put away - yup.

    John did a great job of covering all the bases in his depositions of Peg Leg.
    Last edited by Scorpio girl; 12-22-2017 at 10:49 PM.


  11. #161
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    137

    John Ray vs. Hackett

    You know, for a man who told

    Newsday
    NY Post
    NY Daily News
    CBS, ABC, NBC - tv
    News 12 Long Island
    48 Hours

    and all the other press that was on this case in 2010

    that he NEVER CALLED MARI GILBERT

    and never saw Shannan, never treated Shannan and never met Shannan

    why does he have 7 pages of hand written notes about Shannan Gilbert
    in his notebook from 2010?

  12. #162
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    3,101
    While we all have our guesses... does anyone know the actual/official status of this case against Hackett?

  13. #163
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    216
    I think all these people mentioned includeing SG have some contact or connection to LisK

  14. #164
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    137
    Quote Originally Posted by fred&edna View Post
    While we all have our guesses... does anyone know the actual/official status of this case against Hackett?
    The motions in court are not yet decided. All discovery is therefore temporarily stayed.
    Jan. 30 - next court date.

  15. #165
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    3,101
    Quote Originally Posted by Scorpio girl View Post
    The motions in court are not yet decided. All discovery is therefore temporarily stayed.
    Jan. 30 - next court date.
    I tried to search the Suffolk Co court website but was unsuccessful. Do you have link and maybe descriptive terms I should use... i.e. "estate of shannan gilbert" or the case #?

Page 11 of 13 FirstFirst ... 9 10 11 12 13 LastLast