Her SSN was issued in TX in 1988. There is a LEK from AZ--I think she now lives in CA. We (Carl and I) found her picture in a yearbook and she is definitely NOT the same person. IIRC, we found out that her SSN was connected with a CHILD in Oregon, and a partial # from NJ. I'm not sure exactly what they mean by the "partial" from NJ. I'll find and repost this for reference.
Oh, and about the shoe size--a men's size 11 and a woman's size 11 are not the same size. A woman with feet that would match yours would wear a size 13 woman's.
Well, in France i wear a size 45 shoe. That sounds even MORE enormous.
Nothing here makes sense and until some more info is released we will likely get nowhere. Here is a tentative timeline for LR/LEK. Feel free to correct errors, add, or clarify.
Born between about 1959 and 1969
1988 Applies for SSN in Arizona using LEK birth certificate. She is not LEK.
1987 Lives in Texas
1997 Graduates from U of Texas
2004 Marries
2008(?) Daughter born
2010 Dies
So what could she have done by the age of 19 to 29 that was so bad that she created a new identity? If she had been incarcerated or was AWOL or had a BCD from the military, her prints would have shown up. Illegal alien? Never heard any mention of an accent. Wish she had done a local television interview. She seems to be a total cypher.
The UT records would be very interesting to see indeed, if in fact she ever went there. (I'm betting she didn't, and as she was self employed who would bother to verify her claimed education?) Anyone have access to the UT yearbook from her claimed year of graduation? And I wonder where she claimed to have graduated from HS when (if) she went to UT?
I have been married a long while, and as my wife and I have grown up in the same small town we know a lot about each others's lives and families. Multiple generations of our families have known each other. I could not imagine marrying someone without knowing who her parents were, where she grew up, etc. I'm just saying, some close to her may know more about her true background than they are saying.
I am inclined to believe that it is more embarrassing than criminal, because she never got in any trouble again.
I said it kind of jokingly, but perhaps it WAS a sex change!