goldengirl57
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2013
- Messages
- 299
- Reaction score
- 18
ok I watched it the majority of it is taken up of the story of the McCanns then the last bit is of the investigation.
Basically nothing new apart from a few odd things.
1.The sighting Jane Tanner.
At the time, it was thought that this was a person taking a child home from the creche, it was investigated BUT no one came forward so it stood. It went from someone walking to eventually someone walking with Maddy wearing pink PJ.
2. The window and shutter.
In the crimewatch article the window and shutters and curtains are again OPEN.
3. Madelines bed.
It is cleary stated by Redwood that maddy slept UNDER THE WINDOW.
4. The open bedroom door
It is stated that the bedroom door was found open twice. Once by Gerry who closed it further again, and once by the mother.
5. The Smiths sighting.
The Smiths were called liers and other not nice things when they came forward and said they saw GERRY carrying the child towards the beach. They said it looked like him and carried the same way. They saw this person in full view at 10pm.
So thats if folks. Several people were seen around which were talked about at the time and no one came forward.
............................................................................
OK for me.
Q1.
The met police are only ASSUMING now the sighting COULD be this guy carrying his daughter home from the creche. He never said it was positively this guy. ALSO why did this person simply not come forward at the time they were still there, and it would have been fresh in their memory? Very odd. After SIX years and many many appeals for information. i believe the PJ never did credit her story anyway.
Q2.
How come again the window and shutter is shown open? I thought this was discredited? Also if the shutter was open why was the door open it would have been shut surely with the wind coming through gently......and you would have felt the cold air as you came into the flat and the door if open would have banged shut straight away. No I am confused about this.....
So we are to assume now the person carried the chlid out of the window.
Q3. The childs bed has always been shown by the door. unless i am going nuts I am sure Redwood said she slept UNDER the window.
Q4. The door...well the child could have gone to the toilet..not sure about the door to be honest. Did the abductor come in the patio door and go out the window? WHY. Seems very odd choice....
Q5. The Smiths sighting. Well the only thing i will say about this is why would an abductor or even Gerry be seen strowling along with a child in full view. NON of the sightings actually made any sense to me.
........................................................................
So any thoughts?
I have to say nothing new for me not really i always knew the tanner sighting was bogus anyway.
NEW THEORY on the table burglary gone wrong. Well I said that at the beginning, then why would you take the child away....didnt make much sense.
Basically nothing new apart from a few odd things.
1.The sighting Jane Tanner.
At the time, it was thought that this was a person taking a child home from the creche, it was investigated BUT no one came forward so it stood. It went from someone walking to eventually someone walking with Maddy wearing pink PJ.
2. The window and shutter.
In the crimewatch article the window and shutters and curtains are again OPEN.
3. Madelines bed.
It is cleary stated by Redwood that maddy slept UNDER THE WINDOW.
4. The open bedroom door
It is stated that the bedroom door was found open twice. Once by Gerry who closed it further again, and once by the mother.
5. The Smiths sighting.
The Smiths were called liers and other not nice things when they came forward and said they saw GERRY carrying the child towards the beach. They said it looked like him and carried the same way. They saw this person in full view at 10pm.
So thats if folks. Several people were seen around which were talked about at the time and no one came forward.
............................................................................
OK for me.
Q1.
The met police are only ASSUMING now the sighting COULD be this guy carrying his daughter home from the creche. He never said it was positively this guy. ALSO why did this person simply not come forward at the time they were still there, and it would have been fresh in their memory? Very odd. After SIX years and many many appeals for information. i believe the PJ never did credit her story anyway.
Q2.
How come again the window and shutter is shown open? I thought this was discredited? Also if the shutter was open why was the door open it would have been shut surely with the wind coming through gently......and you would have felt the cold air as you came into the flat and the door if open would have banged shut straight away. No I am confused about this.....
So we are to assume now the person carried the chlid out of the window.
Q3. The childs bed has always been shown by the door. unless i am going nuts I am sure Redwood said she slept UNDER the window.
Q4. The door...well the child could have gone to the toilet..not sure about the door to be honest. Did the abductor come in the patio door and go out the window? WHY. Seems very odd choice....
Q5. The Smiths sighting. Well the only thing i will say about this is why would an abductor or even Gerry be seen strowling along with a child in full view. NON of the sightings actually made any sense to me.
........................................................................
So any thoughts?
I have to say nothing new for me not really i always knew the tanner sighting was bogus anyway.
NEW THEORY on the table burglary gone wrong. Well I said that at the beginning, then why would you take the child away....didnt make much sense.