It is from ST's book. page 192
"Our experts studied the pineapple in the stomach and reported that it was fresh-cut pineapple, consistent down to the rind with what had been found in the bowl. It was solid proof that it wasn't canned pineapple, and what were the chances that an intruder would have brought in a fresh pineapple to cut up for his victim?
I copied this from a candy rose's website here:
http://www.acandyrose.com/s-evidence-pineapple.htm
To augment your information, Venom, and thank you,
one has to keep in mind this premise: Lab reports and other evidentiary material are not necessarily in the public domain. What is in the public arena is only a small portion of the actual evidence.
So backtrack a little to the view of LS -
From Time Magazine is the quote from LS, a defender of the Rs and proponent of the IDI theory: "I believe the Ramseys are innocent," says Smit. "If it's an intruder, it's not the parents, and I think it's that simple."
Now from Venom's link to ACR, here is the interview LS had with JR (from ACR website)
. .Snip. . .
LOU SMIT: We don't know.
. 9 The pineapple is inside her, so we have to
10 figure out how that pineapple got there.
11 There is one way it could get there, she
12 had to eat it at some point.
13 JOHN RAMSEY: Are you sure it was
14 pineapple?
15 LOU SMIT: Yes.
16 JOHN RAMSEY: No question?
17 LOU SMIT: No question. No
18 question. So that's always been the big
19 bugaboo.
. . .Snip . . .