Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
MeeBee, if you don't mind me asking...are you an attorney? I have always thought you might be but have never seen anything to determine whether you are or not.
If you want to discuss the judge and her decision, fine. Let's not start bashing her. The rules apply to JSS as well as anyone else we are discussing on this thread. Discuss how she handles the case is okay but snarky remarks stop here. New thread. Let's move on.
We need some fireworks to start off this thread to celebrate Judge Stephens ruling to dismiss the DP and smackdown the defense::fireworks::fireworks::fireworks::smiliescale::justice::jumping::jumping::jumping::skip::skip::skip::happydance:
I am so glad Travis's family can take this break knowing their brother has been vindicated of the accusations of *advertiser censored*.
Im elated that all the DTs motions were denied but Im also upset about part of the courts rulings.
Specifically, the two State motions which this judge denied with NO explanation. I want to know WHY she denied them.
IIRC, these motions were in reference to the BNs failure to give Juan a copy of the disc he worked on. BNs testiphony was based on this disc and the magical appearance of the incinerator which was not even in existence at that time. I want to know who installed the incinerator and who was behind this.
After failing several times to provide a copy of the disc, Juan filed a motion for sanctions. Why was the motion denied????
Amidst all the virtual tantrums the procedures go on without much understanding or insight until spectators get a little peek into what's going on in sidebars and in written motions. Perhaps some of the judge's actions will serve to keep Arias from ever having a successful appeal in the future. Arias will appeal, that's 100% certain. Instant gratification will never be a part of this case and this will continue to be as it ever was. The outcome is still fairly certain. The killer will never be executed and that too is nearly 100% certain. Hopefully every future avenue for appellate relief will be blocked.
With all due respect, what has style and form got to do with it? She's a really, really bad manager and she has prolonged this case, IMO, in a way that did not have to happen; there have been consequences and that's the most important issue. And if that is just style and form speaking then it makes the law courts look insane. There is nothing timely about this trial and Travis' kin are suffering for it. She is weak in controllng the courtroom and lame when it comes to decisions. Sure, she came charging out of the gate now, but at what cost?Me. And LinasK. :floorlaugh:
But I love you guys anyway. Just be comforted by the fact that, while you're over here thinking the judge is biased against JM because she rules against him on all matters of style and form, the JA supporters are over there thinking the judge is biased against JA because she rules against the defense on every single substantive motion ever since the day she was appointed to this case.