1110 users online (332 members and 778 guests)  




Page 93 of 93 FirstFirst ... 43 83 91 92 93
Results 1,381 to 1,395 of 1395
  1. #1381
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by scadagirl28 View Post
    I keep wondering if * they* got their purses so a car could be moved and their vehicle put in the carport?
    Last summer my company's work party was hosted at one of the owner's homes and at the bottom step of the stairs was where all the girls parked their purses. That made me recall the placement of the three purses in the house. I have since then have the impression the girls and perp(s) all left willingly in one or two cars. But the perps drove the cars back home and brought the purses inside the house.

  2. #1382
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    307
    Quote Originally Posted by scadagirl28 View Post
    I keep wondering if * they* got their purses so a car could be moved and their vehicle put in the carport?
    Dosen’t sound unreasonable . Although we are “assuming “ none of the 19 people that cleaned up the house moved them . That’s been the Achilles heel of this investigation or lack thereof .


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  3. #1383
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,193
    https://www.usnews.com/news/best-sta...in-springfield

    Skeleton remains found in Springfield MO.

    The Springfield News-Leader reports that the remains were found Monday afternoon in southwest Springfield. A witness told police he saw bones in a line of trees.

    Forget it, I think it might be a homeless person.

    http://www.ky3.com/content/news/Poli...474505013.html
    Last edited by Ibiz; Yesterday at 05:26 PM.

  4. #1384
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    1,892
    I don’t want to stir things up or raise false hopes. But there is a possible new suspect not previously discussed.

    Up to this point nothing rules him out.

    Just file away for future reference.

    Finding the remains is still the main sticking point as it is still shown as a missing person case.
    “Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.”

    Arthur Conan Doyle





  5. #1385
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    1,892
    Quote Originally Posted by scadagirl28 View Post
    I keep wondering if * they* got their purses so a car could be moved and their vehicle put in the carport?
    Excellent thought. You are referring to Sherrill’s care are you not?
    “Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.”

    Arthur Conan Doyle





  6. #1386
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    83
    Quote Originally Posted by Missouri Mule View Post
    Excellent thought. You are referring to Sherrill’s care are you not?
    Yes. Can't wait to hear new details when ready .

  7. #1387
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    781
    Quote Originally Posted by Missouri Mule View Post
    I don’t want to stir things up or raise false hopes. But there is a possible new suspect not previously discussed.

    Up to this point nothing rules him out.

    Just file away for future reference.

    Finding the remains is still the main sticking point as it is still shown as a missing person case.
    Can you give us any sort of crumb trail to follow?

    Sent from my SCH-I435L using Tapatalk

  8. #1388
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,113
    Quote Originally Posted by Missouri Mule View Post
    I don’t want to stir things up or raise false hopes. But there is a possible new suspect not previously discussed.

    Up to this point nothing rules him out.

    Just file away for future reference.

    Finding the remains is still the main sticking point as it is still shown as a missing person case.
    I'm open to hearing about any new lead, but unless the person is connected to one of the grave robbers, then I think the new suspect will turn out to be a red herring.

  9. #1389
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    1,892
    Quote Originally Posted by flute4peace View Post
    Can you give us any sort of crumb trail to follow?

    Sent from my SCH-I435L using Tapatalk
    Not at this point. Too dangerous and potentially libelous if proven incorrect. Along with some others have been looking at him seriously. If anything develops will be sure to update. Cannot say for sure the police know of him although they should. They will be if not already.

    Is NOT connected to the grave robbers.

    Could (speculating only) that he might be involved with Robert Craig Cox.
    “Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.”

    Arthur Conan Doyle





  10. #1390
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,113
    Quote Originally Posted by Missouri Mule View Post
    Not at this point. Too dangerous and potentially libelous if proven incorrect. Along with some others have been looking at him seriously. If anything develops will be sure to update. Cannot say for sure the police know of him although they should. They will be if not already.

    Is NOT connected to the grave robbers.

    Could (speculating only) that he might be involved with Robert Craig Cox.
    I wouldn't write it off if he could be connected to Cox...I can't completely rule out Cox even though I doubt his involvement. (His target would probably have been Stacey, and it seems improbable that he would have tageted her at Suzie & Sherril's house.)


  11. #1391
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,450
    Cox is only one of several known sexual predators with ties to Springfield at the time, but none of them have ever been linked to the missing Three. The grave robbers have what could be regarded as the only known criminal motive for killing any of the women. They were only kids with without the experience to pull off what appears to have been a clean abduction. I believe one was latter arrested for a property crime but otherwise they have stayed out of trouble. The charges they faced were trivial compared to triple murder. Overall, they just don’t fit the profile you would expect of someone who would have pulled this off.

    Evidence at the crime scene was consistent with the perpetrator being allowed to enter the home as someone Susie or Sherrie knew and trusted. It is hardly conclusive but that is a strong possibility.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  12. #1392
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    1,892
    Quote Originally Posted by kemo View Post
    Cox is only one of several known sexual predators with ties to Springfield at the time, but none of them have ever been linked to the missing Three. The grave robbers have what could be regarded as the only known criminal motive for killing any of the women. They were only kids with without the experience to pull off what appears to have been a clean abduction. I believe one was latter arrested for a property crime but otherwise they have stayed out of trouble. The charges they faced were trivial compared to triple murder. Overall, they just don’t fit the profile you would expect of someone who would have pulled this off.

    Evidence at the crime scene was consistent with the perpetrator being allowed to enter the home as someone Susie or Sherrie knew and trusted. It is hardly conclusive but that is a strong possibility.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Long time no see.

    Question: Do we truly know the perps actually entered the home, except perhaps to pull Stacy out of the home?

    Scenario: The perp and accomplice followed the girls home. Argument ensued outside the home. Sherrill came out to investigate. They were subdued and thrown into a vehicle; possibly the fabled van. But Stacy wasn't supposed to be there. She heard the commotion and attempted to escape. She was unsuccessful, trying to get back into the house having gotten out the back sliding glass door. She was then thrown into the van or other vehicle.

    I'm liking the unknown stalker/ opportunist hanging around the party goers that night. That was Mike Clay's theory. He may be onto something.

    Thoughts:
    “Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.”

    Arthur Conan Doyle





  13. #1393
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    57
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozoner View Post
    I wouldn't write it off if he could be connected to Cox...I can't completely rule out Cox even though I doubt his involvement. (His target would probably have been Stacey, and it seems improbable that he would have tageted her at Suzie & Sherril's house.)
    I also doubt Cox's involvement but agree he can't be ruled out. His target could have been Sherrill, we do not know if he saw her or knew her from somewhere.
    Larry Hall always said his brother was obsessed with one of the women and abducted them with another man. I know he's probably crazy but also passed a polygraph. To my knowledge was not ruled out.
    Biz...I also saw the article on someone finding remains in Springfield. Have they released for sure who it was? That gave me some hope for a minute.


    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

  14. #1394
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    57
    Quote Originally Posted by Missouri Mule View Post
    Long time no see.

    Question: Do we truly know the perps actually entered the home, except perhaps to pull Stacy out of the home?

    Scenario: The perp and accomplice followed the girls home. Argument ensued outside the home. Sherrill came out to investigate. They were subdued and thrown into a vehicle; possibly the fabled van. But Stacy wasn't supposed to be there. She heard the commotion and attempted to escape. She was unsuccessful, trying to get back into the house having gotten out the back sliding glass door. She was then thrown into the van or other vehicle.

    I'm liking the unknown stalker/ opportunist hanging around the party goers that night. That was Mike Clay's theory. He may be onto something.

    Thoughts:
    If we follow the clues in the house, them taking off makeup, changing clothes, and turning tv on. This doesn't fit what the authorities believed happened. Someone could have surely followed them home, but sat and watched the house(allowing them time to relax) before they attacked. So, I actually do believe someone was in the house or at least at the door.


    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

  15. #1395
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,193
    Quote Originally Posted by MaggieSky View Post
    I also doubt Cox's involvement but agree he can't be ruled out. His target could have been Sherrill, we do not know if he saw her or knew her from somewhere.
    Larry Hall always said his brother was obsessed with one of the women and abducted them with another man. I know he's probably crazy but also passed a polygraph. To my knowledge was not ruled out.
    Biz...I also saw the article on someone finding remains in Springfield. Have they released for sure who it was? That gave me some hope for a minute.


    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
    Lieutenant Robert Burne with the Springfield Police Department says it appears the person died where the body was found. Lt. Burne believes there are no clear signs of foul play.
    I too think it's possible that Hall could have been responsible for this crime. He drove a van, and home invasions were right up his alley. Also, it was said that he was in the area around the time.

    I don't think it's impossible that the three could have went to George's Steak House. Hall and a buddie could have spied the three inside or outside George's , and followed them back to Delmar.

    The pair could have parked on the street corner for about an hour or so, watching the house, and waiting for all the lights to go off before launching a home invasion on the three woman.
    Last edited by Ibiz; Today at 07:34 PM.

Page 93 of 93 FirstFirst ... 43 83 91 92 93


Similar Threads

  1. The Springfield Three--missing since June 1992 - #6
    By SheWhoMustNotBeNamed in forum The Springfield Three
    Replies: 1022
    Last Post: 07-05-2016, 10:44 AM
  2. The Springfield Three--missing since June 1992 - #5
    By SheWhoMustNotBeNamed in forum The Springfield Three
    Replies: 751
    Last Post: 06-15-2012, 01:58 AM
  3. The Springfield Three--missing since June 1992 - #4
    By christine2448 in forum The Springfield Three
    Replies: 1035
    Last Post: 04-19-2011, 09:02 PM
  4. The Springfield Three--missing since June 1992 - #1
    By englishleigh in forum The Springfield Three
    Replies: 630
    Last Post: 02-05-2008, 10:56 AM

Tags for this Thread