1107 users online (329 members and 778 guests)  



View Poll Results: By Accident or on Purpose Who Killed JonBenet Ramsey?

Voters
495. You may not vote on this poll
  • An Intruder Killed JonBenet and Covered Up the Crime

    35 7.07%
  • Patsy Ramsey Acted Alone in Killing JonBenet and Covering Up the Crime

    22 4.44%
  • John Ramsey Acted Alone in Killing JonBenet and Covering Up the Crime

    2 0.40%
  • Burke Killed JonBenet with Patsy and John Helping to Cover Up the Crime

    365 73.74%
  • John and Patsy Acted Together in Killing JonBenet and Covering Up the Crime

    28 5.66%
  • Other/I Don't Know

    43 8.69%

Page 81 of 81 FirstFirst ... 31 71 79 80 81
Results 1,201 to 1,215 of 1215
  1. #1201
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    South Dakota
    Posts
    479
    I don’t know who killed JonBenét. But, to say BR being responsible for her death is preposterous, is well, preposterous itself.

    PDI hero, Steve Thomas was on Tricia’s True Crime Radio with Chief Kolar back in December of 2012.

    I’ve detailed a few quotes from the show with Mr. Thomas below:

    “I just am very impressed with his book, and what he’s put forth.”

    “I didn’t think much surprised me about the case anymore until, I read his book, and read, you know, some profound and staggeringly, significant revelations that he made about things that went on, and a couple of items of evidentiary nature.”

    “Regardless if, Chief Kolar, and I, may have some differences in opinion within the case, I think we share more things in common, then we do apart, as far as the case goes.”

    “One of the things Chief Kolar mentioned in his book that may prove quite helpful, is subpoenas, or demands on perhaps, certain medical or psychiatric records or any number of things.”

    Has Steve Thomas changed his who-dun-it? Perhaps, and perhaps not. But that’s not really the point I’m trying to make.

    The point is that, Steve Thomas respects and values Kolar’s Investigative work and vision on the case. He knows the children’s medical and psychiatric records are important.

    Why did someone break into the department of Social Services and pilfer Burke Ramsey’s records in June of 1997?

    One thing I know for sure is that all three Rams are involved and are responsible for the ongoing cover-up. So, if your rooting for BR/JR to win his lawsuit against CBS, then yes, you are a Ramsey apologist.



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  2. #1202
    Quote Originally Posted by Cottonstar View Post
    I don’t know who killed JonBenét. But, to say BR being responsible for her death is preposterous, is well, preposterous itself.

    PDI hero, Steve Thomas was on Tricia’s True Crime Radio with Chief Kolar back in December of 2012.

    I’ve detailed a few quotes from the show with Mr. Thomas below:

    “I just am very impressed with his book, and what he’s put forth.”

    “I didn’t think much surprised me about the case anymore until, I read his book, and read, you know, some profound and staggeringly, significant revelations that he made about things that went on, and a couple of items of evidentiary nature.”

    “Regardless if, Chief Kolar, and I, may have some differences in opinion within the case, I think we share more things in common, then we do apart, as far as the case goes.”

    “One of the things Chief Kolar mentioned in his book that may prove quite helpful, is subpoenas, or demands on perhaps, certain medical or psychiatric records or any number of things.”

    Has Steve Thomas changed his who-dun-it? Perhaps, and perhaps not. But that’s not really the point I’m trying to make.

    The point is that, Steve Thomas respects and values Kolar’s Investigative work and vision on the case. He knows the children’s medical and psychiatric records are important.

    Why did someone break into the department of Social Services and pilfer Burke Ramsey’s records in June of 1997?

    One thing I know for sure is that all three Rams are involved and are responsible for the ongoing cover-up. So, if your rooting for BR/JR to win his lawsuit against CBS, then yes, you are a Ramsey apologist.



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

    Excellent post!


    To date no one has profited more off of the death of Jonbenet Ramsey then L Lin Wood!!!!!!

  3. #1203
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Globe or Earth or whatever
    Posts
    183
    I think that there was some external molestation but I am not sure if it was direct or indirect.

    Situation after the crime can suggest that you were overreacting for publicity or someone (or some group) wanted to clean any evidence pointing to him/them.

    I am not eager to check reports and I do not have access to most of them probably. I doubt they are available somewhere.

    I can only push some ideas so knowledgeable ones could rethink their thesis.

    This was not an average situation and I do not have access to any statistics which could clear something.

    Access to her medical past and what was done for health reasons to her and to her close surroundings could be helpful.
    JonBenét Case, The burglar Theory:
    http://jonbenetramsey.pbworks.com/w/...rglar%20Theory

  4. #1204
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    9,014
    Quote Originally Posted by Peppermintswirlz View Post
    Why would believing the perpetrator was Burke have cause the Ramsey's pediatrician to hide evidence of sexual abuse?

    I couldn't count how many cases there have been that have been discussed right here on Websleuths that involved a child ending up dead after mandatory reporters repeatedly ignored obvious signs of abuse and most of the parents in those cases didn't have the kind of wealth and social standing that surrounded The Ramsey's as a protective shield.

    From Ann Louise Bardach's Vanity Fair article (October 1997): “Dr. Cyril Wecht, a well-known forensic pathologist, has no doubt that the 45-pound child was molested. ‘If she had been taken to a hospital emergency room, and doctors had seen the genital evidence, the father would have been arrested,’ he has said. The vaginal opening, according to Dr. Robert Kirschner of the University of Chicago's pathology department, was twice the normal size for six-year-olds. ‘The genital injuries indicate penetration,’ he says, ‘but probably not by a penis, and are evidence of molestation that night as well as previous molestation.’”

    Note that Wecht, one of the world's most noted and experienced forensic pathologists, refers to "the father," and not "the brother." I don't think it even occurred to him that Burke could have been responsible for those injuries.

    Peppermintswirlz.
    Oh you left Steve Thomas out. He viewed all the magnified photographs of JonBenet's genitals, he knew she had been assaulted, no doubt about. Steve Thomas, Just like James Kolar will have read over Dr Andrew Sirotnak's second medical examination of JonBenet, so they know one way or the other!

    Yet Steve Thomas in his book is saying the case is PDI and its really a bedwetting case gone wrong?

    One thing I know is that these books are not allowed to publish the truth only theories, otherwise the authors get sued by their ex-employers.

    What does that tell you ?

    .
    Last edited by UKGuy; 11-03-2017 at 05:18 PM.

  5. #1205
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    1,246
    Quote Originally Posted by UKGuy View Post
    *snip*One thing I know is that these books are not allowed to publish the truth only theories, otherwise the authors get sued by their ex-employers.

    What does that tell you ?

    .
    And what about the authors who have not been sued?

  6. #1206
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    728
    Quote Originally Posted by Peppermintswirlz View Post
    Why would believing the perpetrator was Burke have cause the Ramsey's pediatrician to hide evidence of sexual abuse?

    I couldn't count how many cases there have been that have been discussed right here on Websleuths that involved a child ending up dead after mandatory reporters repeatedly ignored obvious signs of abuse and most of the parents in those cases didn't have the kind of wealth and social standing that surrounded The Ramsey's as a protective shield.

    From Ann Louise Bardach's Vanity Fair article (October 1997): “Dr. Cyril Wecht, a well-known forensic pathologist, has no doubt that the 45-pound child was molested. ‘If she had been taken to a hospital emergency room, and doctors had seen the genital evidence, the father would have been arrested,’ he has said. The vaginal opening, according to Dr. Robert Kirschner of the University of Chicago's pathology department, was twice the normal size for six-year-olds. ‘The genital injuries indicate penetration,’ he says, ‘but probably not by a penis, and are evidence of molestation that night as well as previous molestation.’”

    Note that Wecht, one of the world's most noted and experienced forensic pathologists, refers to "the father," and not "the brother." I don't think it even occurred to him that Burke could have been responsible for those injuries.
    Burke was ruled out fairly quickly(of murder anyways) by LE. The experts were more concerned with the murder/assault that night and with Burke ruled out, little to no attention was going to be aimed in his direction by anyone.

    They didn't focus on JAR either and statistically speaking he was a much more likely abuser of children in the house than the surviving younger sibling. Why didn't they focus on him either in this regard? Because like with Burke there's no evidence he killed her so he was ruled out.

    When taking these two siblings out of the equation for better or worse, by default it leaves John.

    IMO the overlapping crimes(murder and molestation) in this case threw a spanner in the works and out of all the reasons the case was never solved, it's fairly high on the list.

    Why would believing the perpetrator was Burke have cause the Ramsey's pediatrician to hide evidence of sexual abuse?
    Due to the fact they were six and nine year olds, it could've been chalked up as child's play/playing doctor without any need to hide anything.

  7. #1207
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    6,189
    Quote Originally Posted by singularity View Post
    Due to the fact they were six and nine year olds, it could've been chalked up as child's play/playing doctor without any need to hide anything.

    Kids playing doctor? JonBenet's vaginal opening was twice the size of a normal vagina of a child her age..

  8. #1208
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    728
    Quote Originally Posted by Peppermintswirlz View Post
    Kids playing doctor? JonBenet's vaginal opening was twice the size of a normal vagina of a child her age..
    I'm aware of that. They didn't think he did that...and neither do I. Which is why any contact between the two(such as the LHP incident) can be chalked up as kids playing doctor. Anything her pediatrician might have noticed would've been during her last physical exam(if he checked), not at autopsy.

  9. #1209
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    9,014
    Quote Originally Posted by singularity View Post
    I'm aware of that. They didn't think he did that...and neither do I. Which is why any contact between the two(such as the LHP incident) can be chalked up as kids playing doctor. Anything her pediatrician might have noticed would've been during her last physical exam(if he checked), not at autopsy.
    singularity
    My understanding is that De Beuf says he never did a full genital examination on JonBenet EVER ! He has to say that since if prior chronic sexual assault on JonBenet can be demonstrated then he is in trouble since he missed it and he is not paid to do that?

    Another take is multiple concurrent abuse by family members, with one proving fatal?

    .

  10. #1210
    Singularity,

    Yes, I did get caught up in poop gate MANY months ago (not a shining moment). I haven’t brought it up since, but you yet again have. Here’s an example of twisting my words or putting words in my mouth.

    My Post. Would parents who were abusing their children put them in therapy? It’s doubtful.


    Your response. You're actually saying that children in therapy have never been abused? WOW


    Would the abusing parent put the abused child in the position to tell a therapist? It’s just too absurd to entertain. Where did I say NO abused child goes to therapy?


    And again


    My post. Parents are abusing the kids and none of the court mandated reporters report, really?


    Your response. So not only do you believe children placed in therapy aren't being abused but you also believe court reporters always detect and report it.


    I was referencing the many court mandated reporters in the childs/childrens lives and the fact that not ONE of them reported. Where did I say they ALWAYS detect and report? There was a Pediatrician,therapist/s, school administrators, teachers, school nurses, I think there was even a school psychologist (?) I could be wrong about that. I’m not referring to just the sexual abuse, but physical abuse as well. They however wouldn’t have reported it, if it was a child and he was getting help already. He was in therapy prior to12/25/96 why? Equally important, why was the six y/o in therapy. Either P/JR were personally abusing her, or they were getting her help, but they weren’t doing both. Interestingly enough’ P/JR weren’t indicted for sexual abuse. Huh, wonder who the GJ thought was responsible for that?


    Your Post. I'm not twisting your words or putting words in your mouth. I quote your words...and not out of context either.


    Well I think I’ve proven this to be untrue.


    I’m not going to talk about the feces, but I will correct you on it. More than LHP talked about the feces, there was also the nanny Geraldine Vodicka. There’s evidence of a POSSIBLE fecal issue.


    Your post. Statute of limitations for all charges except murder is long pastexpired. In the event of BDI, investigation should've closed eons ago.


    Not true, who applied the garrote? That’s the person who killed her. The GJ’s, who did what dilemma. The adult R’s were looking at charges either way and JR still could be, if he tied the garrote. Again, I don’t believe BR was in this by himself. And none of them want to beknown for doing any of it.


    Your post. These extreme emotional reactions and feelings I supposedly have towards any specific 'DI' exist only in your head.


    Whatever helps you sleep at night.


    Sorry that I asked for your experience. However, I didn’t ask for anything I’m not willing to give. I was a Social and Human Services Assistant for fifteen years. I worked specifically as a social worker assistant for D.C.F.S. After that, I gave five years to CASA. The last four years I’ve spent countless hours with child psychologists, therapists,and support groups for abused and abusive children. This doesn’t make my theory right or me a know it all, because I don’t know it all. I asked for yours, because it seems like you do.


    I don’t know for sure who killed that poor little girl, but my experience tells me BR was involved. If I’m wrong, I’ll take my crow with ketchup and a nice Chianti.


    To date no one has profited more off of the death of Jonbenet Ramsey then L Lin Wood!!!!!!


  11. #1211
    Quote Originally Posted by Tricia View Post
    After watching the programs for the past week and a half it will be interesting to see if people have changed their mind as to what happened with JonBenet Ramsey.

    Please vote and then comment if you like.

    Thank you for your participation.

    Tricia

    Certainty an accident. I looked at the mother, and I saw in her eyes actually looking at it as it was happening...

  12. #1212
    Quote Originally Posted by TheMwhisperer View Post
    Certainty an accident. I looked at the mother, and I saw in her eyes actually looking at it as it was happening...
    Let me explain further..like everyone, I always wondered 'Who Did It'. But just recently, I happen to come up with a new technique that can pinpoint who did it. So, when I looked at this case, I decided to give it a try and see if now if I can tell who did it.

    I first scanned the Father (i always suspected he was the one), and to my surprise he is completely innocent.
    He might have known who done it but he had nothing to do with it...he did not see it happen. He did not commit the crime. So, he's out as a suspect. Then I scanned the Mother...and it hit me like a ton of bricks!

    I said to myself, "OMG, she did it!" Not only did my scan pointed her out, but I was even able to see in her eyes her looking at the crime scene as it was happening in her mind.

    I don't think she meant to do it, these things happen...I can understand her not wanting to go to jail.

    It was disturbing for me to continue to look at her, she was in so much pain over what happen.

    I cannot look at her anymore, it's just to painful. I didn't know I was capable of seeing so much in her.

    I do scans all the time now with photos or videos. So far I have been 100 percent accurate.

    I would like to transfer my abilities to artificial programs so that others can use it.

    Hopefully it can be used to keep innocent people out of jail.

    TheMwhispherer

  13. #1213
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    13,248
    Quote Originally Posted by TheMwhisperer View Post
    Let me explain further..like everyone, I always wondered 'Who Did It'. But just recently, I happen to come up with a new technique that can pinpoint who did it. So, when I looked at this case, I decided to give it a try and see if now if I can tell who did it.

    I first scanned the Father (i always suspected he was the one), and to my surprise he is completely innocent.
    He might have known who done it but he had nothing to do with it...he did not see it happen. He did not commit the crime. So, he's out as a suspect. Then I scanned the Mother...and it hit me like a ton of bricks!

    I said to myself, "OMG, she did it!" Not only did my scan pointed her out, but I was even able to see in her eyes her looking at the crime scene as it was happening in her mind.

    I don't think she meant to do it, these things happen...I can understand her not wanting to go to jail.

    It was disturbing for me to continue to look at her, she was in so much pain over what happen.

    I cannot look at her anymore, it's just to painful. I didn't know I was capable of seeing so much in her.

    I do scans all the time now with photos or videos. So far I have been 100 percent accurate.

    I would like to transfer my abilities to artificial programs so that others can use it.

    Hopefully it can be used to keep innocent people out of jail.

    TheMwhispherer
    That would be awesome.

  14. #1214
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    143
    Quote Originally Posted by SecretaryGal View Post
    Interesting. I see 5 folks believe IDI. I would love to hear the theory on this.

    Did they/he/she:

    (1) Write RN first, then try to kidnap (but things go wrong?) so, set up an elaborate crime scene instead and leave the body behind? or

    (2) Try to kidnap first, things go wrong, and then write up an elaborate, totally worthless RN (to what end?)

    I'm really trying to see how this can even be plausible....
    Speaking as an IDIer, any of these scenarios:

    1. The ransom note is written first. He intends to kidnap JonBénet but return her unharmed when the ransom is paid, but in the process accidentally kills her. He panics and flees.

    2. The ransom note is written first. He never intended to kidnap JonBénet. He went in with the intent to murder this girl, and the note was just a way to torment the family.

    3. A combination of the above. He planned to return her...dead. Just like William Edward Hickman tormented the parents of Marion Parker by giving them false hope, the kidnapper intended to give JonBénet back upon the payment of the ransom, but deceased.

    4. The ransom note is written afterwards. He botched the kidnapping.

    5. The ransom note is written afterwards. He never intended to take her alive, and this was his way of further tormenting them.

    6. He didn't write the note - Patsy did, thinking that Burke or John did it and was covering for him. Botched kidnapping.

    7. He didn't write the note - Patsy did. He went in, killed her, and left.

    There's many, many different ways that an intruder could have gone about this. It's not even necessary for him to have written the letter at all - it's entirely possible that Patsy wrote it, thinking she was covering up a murder committed by Burke or John.

    I can't see any member of this family committing such a violent crime towards JonBénet. No history of violence before or after the crime? Come on.

    All the Ramseys are guilty of is being found guilty in the court of public opinion, or perhaps covering up a crime they think one of their own did but which they didn't.

  15. #1215
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    9,014
    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor Haumea View Post
    Speaking as an IDIer, any of these scenarios:

    1. The ransom note is written first. He intends to kidnap JonBénet but return her unharmed when the ransom is paid, but in the process accidentally kills her. He panics and flees.

    2. The ransom note is written first. He never intended to kidnap JonBénet. He went in with the intent to murder this girl, and the note was just a way to torment the family.

    3. A combination of the above. He planned to return her...dead. Just like William Edward Hickman tormented the parents of Marion Parker by giving them false hope, the kidnapper intended to give JonBénet back upon the payment of the ransom, but deceased.

    4. The ransom note is written afterwards. He botched the kidnapping.

    5. The ransom note is written afterwards. He never intended to take her alive, and this was his way of further tormenting them.

    6. He didn't write the note - Patsy did, thinking that Burke or John did it and was covering for him. Botched kidnapping.

    7. He didn't write the note - Patsy did. He went in, killed her, and left.

    There's many, many different ways that an intruder could have gone about this. It's not even necessary for him to have written the letter at all - it's entirely possible that Patsy wrote it, thinking she was covering up a murder committed by Burke or John.

    I can't see any member of this family committing such a violent crime towards JonBénet. No history of violence before or after the crime? Come on.

    All the Ramseys are guilty of is being found guilty in the court of public opinion, or perhaps covering up a crime they think one of their own did but which they didn't.

    Sailor Haumea,
    One thing we do know is how dysfunctional the family was, so really the children were neglected unless they were included in Patsy's Project portfolio.

    The dynamic at play might include JR and BR with Patsy looking on? JonBenet might have learned intimate behaviour from one family member and displayed it with another?

    What we need to see is Dr Andrew Sirotnak's second medical examination write up since that will confirm if her genital injury was staged or was for real?

    Do intruders stage sexual assaults on abductees?

    .

Page 81 of 81 FirstFirst ... 31 71 79 80 81


Similar Threads

  1. If JonBenet's death was an accident...
    By eileenhawkeye in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 314
    Last Post: 05-16-2011, 02:37 PM
  2. Replies: 48
    Last Post: 07-21-2008, 05:01 AM
  3. Ex-Housekeeper Say Patsy Ramsey Killed JonBenet.
    By Ames in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 212
    Last Post: 04-21-2008, 11:56 PM
  4. Reasons why I believe a Ramsey killed Jonbenet
    By Keona in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 07-10-2005, 12:48 AM
  5. "Who Killed JonBenet Ramsey?"
    By Nehemiah in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 190
    Last Post: 02-13-2004, 04:44 PM