Jayelles, I reread all the articles and have come to the conclusion that this is not anything really new.
Due to new technology, another marker or two was able to get extracted and read. DNA technology gets more sophisticated everyday. This was announced several months ago.
The DNA previously has been checked against the database and "there were no hits. It can be checked against the database with less markers than it needs to be permanently entered into the database. Some of the articles state that there have been no hits. It is now entered permanently because of the 10 markers or whatever and new entries will be checked against it.
The RST is banking on a future entry of matching DNA -- I.E. that the perp will commit another crime. So far he hasn't left his DNA at another crime scene, and we know he isn't a convicted felon of a sex crime.
In today's Daily Camera article, the following is stated:
http://www.dailycamera.com/bdc/city_news/article/0,1713,BDC_2422_2534571,00.html
"Boulder County District Attorney Mary Keenan confirmed Friday that the DNA had been entered into the Combined DNA Index System since she took over the investigation from Boulder police last December.
But Keenan, who hired a full-time investigator for the JonBenet case in June, said she didn't know when that task was accomplished and hasn't heard any news in the case.
"As far as I know there is nothing major going on," she said. "
This tells us that this is nothing new. I think it's a PR campaign.
We knew the entry into the databank was about to happen, or did happen a few months ago.
This did not just happen yesterday. Mr. Wood must have issued a press release to coincide with the FoxNews lawsuit filing. The average citizen does not understand the logistics of DNA testing and the articles were somewhat ambiguous about timing if one was not familiar with previous statements and information about the DNA.
It is no new relevation, it is something we have known about--it's just a press release that was intended to be intruder-oriented to coincide with the Fox filing. This also was a method to get in another barb to the Boulder police a day or two after the announcement of the Fox lawsuit whereas Carol M. stated that police sources say there is no evidence of an intruder, and a barb to infer that the police held on to this DNA and were negligent to get it tested.
I've heard about that town getting tested, in fact I thouht I saw something like that on "New Deectives' or "Cold Cases". Problem is, Boulder and much of the U.S. has a very transient population, unlike many of the villages and towns in the U.K. I forget the latest count, but there has been an incredible number of DNA samples taken in the case, in spite of what the RST would like the public to believe.