I have always wondered something and maybe some of you can shed some light on it. The ransom note was titled Mr. Ramsey. The practice note was titled Mr. and Mrs. R, (the downward slash of the R only, as we know). What I can't seem to put my finger on is what difference this makes? Why change it to just Mr. Ramsey? I have to say up front that I believe Patsy wrote that note. But I'm still able to look at it from all sides. I wonder, if it was an intruder who wrote it what was the reason for changing it? I wonder, if Patsy wrote it what was the reason for changing it? I've thought before that if Patsy wrote it then it would be better for her if she included the Mrs. Ramsey, since she would then look more like a victim. But the actual content of the note only refers to John, even calling him by his first name. So did the notewriter know already what they were going to write in the note and therefore to address it to Mrs. Ramsey wouldn't make sense because there's nothing about her in it? That would be premeditated then, and not written as a cover-up for an accident. Also theres been a big deal about the fact that Jonbenet's name was never written , but then again neithor was Burkes, or Patsys. But back to my original question. I fail to see a reason to change the heading from Mr. and Mrs. Ramsey to just Mr. Ramsey. It seems too simplistic to say that Patsy wrote the note and that's why she didn't include herself. It wouldn't be self-incriminating in my view, it would have made her seem like more of a victim. What the heck am I missing?