D
Deleted member 278
Guest
http://www.doctoroz.com/episode/tru...n-prove-jonbene-t-ramsey-s-murder-was-covered
"Doc" and Judith Miller today on Dr. Oz.
"Doc" and Judith Miller today on Dr. Oz.
http://www.doctoroz.com/episode/tru...n-prove-jonbene-t-ramsey-s-murder-was-covered
"Doc" and Judith Miller today on Dr. Oz.
Soft sell.
NG was adamant, BR could not
have committed the murder.
incidents of fraticide rare.
NG excludes JR and BR as culprits.
Comments that JBR's hyman was intact?
No one in JM's circle of friends knew that JBR
was competing in beauty contest till well after the fact?
JBR had dark hair. PR says it was sun bleached
On first read of the rn, JM recognized the
'and hence', reminiscent of a 'brag' type
Christmas letter PR had sent.
DM says the Ramseys' legal team put
too much pressure on the DA's office.
DM points to PR as author of rn
Tadpole12,
JonBenet's hymen was intact, really? Of all people the Miller's should know that JonBenet's hymen was eroded, probably not a smoking gun, but along with the rest of her genital injuries maybe it points to chronic sexual abuse?
The only way I can see a realistic PDI is if JonBenet's chronic molestation and her acute genital injury are separate events, i.e. the former is prior abuse and the latter staging.
As for the pageants and the Miller's ignorance, really, all those photo shoots and new outfits for JonBenet, the singing lessons, weekends away, etc, maybe JM chooses not to remember?
The case could simply turn out to be JR and PR colluding together because they both knew they were looking at child neglect charges at a minimum?
You'd think these people would know better.
That IS what I'm suggesting, UKGuy.
I think it's safe to say that the Ramseys were choosing their circle of friends at that point.
It could indeed.
You could be right. I reckon it all comes down to what Dr Andrew Sirotnak decided was the cause of JonBenet's genital injury, later transposed in Steve Thomas' book to genital trauma!That IS what I'm suggesting, UKGuy.
Detective Arndt told Your Affiant that she witnessed the autopsy of JonBenet Ramsey which was conducted by Dr. John Meyer on December 26, 1996. Detective Arndt told Your Affiant that she observed Dr. Meyer examine the vaginal area of the victim and heard him state that the victim had received an injury consistent with digital penetration of her vagina. Detective Arndt told Your Affiant that Dr. Meyer told her that is was his opinion that the victim had been subjected to sexual contact.
You could be right. I reckon it all comes down to what Dr Andrew Sirotnak decided was the cause of JonBenet's genital injury, later transposed in Steve Thomas' book to genital trauma!
.
Humble question. Someone has claimed that PR used to give douches to JBR. Is that true? That could account for vaginal trauma. Of course, someone might be channeling Sybil and/or utterly making it up.
887sMtreme,
What do you think, a six year old girl needing to be douched?
.
You could be right. I reckon it all comes down to what Dr Andrew Sirotnak decided was the cause of JonBenet's genital injury, later transposed in Steve Thomas' book to genital trauma!
January 30, 1997 Search Warrant, excerpt
So in the first examination Coroner Meyer establishes that JonBenet has received a genital injury which he interprets as sexual in scope.
In the second examination Dr Andrew Sirotnak, an assistant professor of pediatrics at the Universiy of Colorado's Health Services Center confirms Coroner Meyer's earlier finding of genital injury, but his assumed cause has never been declared.
Is this because he thinks the genital injury was staging, if so then there is a good case for interpreting the case as PDI?
Even so a PDI raises many questions, such as: why the longjohns, the size-12's, why not stage JonBenet's bedroom to match the R's version of events, why forget about the pineapple snack ...
We really need Tricia to interview Dr Andrew Sirotnak so he can offer a hint as to which side of the fence he is on: sexual assault or staging?
IMO it's all a cover up. Hide what Burke did that night by bashing in her head and hide the sexual molestation of the young half siblings by the teenage JAR.
BBM
John's shirt was identified as the source of fibers inside the panty crotch of the panties JonBenet was wearing on the night in question.
Now if those are JR's fibers inside the size-12's, how did they get there?
On the surface it looks like JDI?
JonBenet had been sexually assaulted (blood was present in the crotch of her undies) and her private area wiped down, after which she was either redressed or the bottom clothes she had been wearing prior to (or during) the sex assault were placed back on her (or pulled back up).
I have been puzzled by why it is that no one thinks he could have done this.