candy
Inactive
Catherine Crier will have a segment on the JonBenet Ramsey case today @ 5:00 pm on Court TV. It doesn't look promising w/ Poz and Larry Kobalinsky.
Crier on JonBenet case today
- Thread starter candy
- Start date
K777angel
Member
Ugh! Larry Pozner? I'd rather scrape my fingernails on the chalkboard than listen to that creep. He has to be the UN-happiest man alive. So full of anger.
Imon128
Former Member
Right, Poz the Schnozz...big ugh. I will watch, though, because of interest in the case. Poz is so predictable, amongst his other unsavory characteristics. 
Ivy
Inactive
I have never seen Pozner when he's not throwing a tantrum. I agree...UGH.
candy
Inactive
Well, just like I thought, it was an entirely one sided pro-Ramsey show. How Catherine Crier has folded and capitulated is just awful. There wasn't ANYONE representing "the other side" because all you have to do to the likes of Crier is say "lawsuit", and they fold.
They talked also with the author of a People Magazine article on the piece, the author from Atlanta, which tells you all you need to know about that article.
Also, note to Fox News, this People magazine writer also said the Ramseys moved to Charlevoix last summer.
They talked also with the author of a People Magazine article on the piece, the author from Atlanta, which tells you all you need to know about that article.
Also, note to Fox News, this People magazine writer also said the Ramseys moved to Charlevoix last summer.
Imon128
Former Member
Very one sided and not entirely factual. Not to mention it looks like Edward Scissor Hands got to Poz's hair, or else let Poz use them. Waste of air space, but I'm glad I tuned it in just to see what's the Lin's spin.
Britt
New Member
lol... Yeah, I always enjoy seeing the Poz. :crazy: Kinda miss the roadkill 'do, and he appears to be experimenting with gel... mousse, maybe...
Never thought of him as angry, though. I thought he was going more for drama... y'know like, what he lacks in substance he tries to make up for in presentation.
Never thought of him as angry, though. I thought he was going more for drama... y'know like, what he lacks in substance he tries to make up for in presentation.
Ivy
Inactive
Pozner...what a star he are. har.
Barbara
New Member
Make no mistake:
Catherine Crier has said on more than one occasion that the parents should not be removed from that infamous "umbrella". CTV has, I'm sure told her to be careful with her comments, but make no mistake, she believes the family is involved in the murder.
She has said it as her personal opinion only.
Catherine Crier has said on more than one occasion that the parents should not be removed from that infamous "umbrella". CTV has, I'm sure told her to be careful with her comments, but make no mistake, she believes the family is involved in the murder.
She has said it as her personal opinion only.
Ivy
Inactive
Since the networks, including CTV, are apparently too chicken to contradict Wood and the Ramseys, why do they have them on? Why must the networks give the RST an uncontested forum from which to spread their lies and IDI propoganda? Why don't the networks just say NO?
Barbara
New Member
Ivy said:
$$$$$$$$$$$ :razz:
Ivy
Inactive
Oh...I thought networks paid their guests, not the other way around.
I s'pose that soon Wood will have his own show.
I s'pose that soon Wood will have his own show.
Barbara
New Member
Ivy said:
No, it's not that. It is the fact that the mere mention of JBR brings viewers, in turn brings sponsors, and HENCE $$$$$
It doesn't matter to most whether what is being said is true or not, just that they have viewers. Viewers equal more money.
Ivy
Inactive
Thanks, Barbara, I gotcha now. What a travesty.