JMK....DNA, doesn't match
- Thread starter lilpony
- Start date
izzyB
Inactive
if the DNA does not match, as JMK said himself it would not, then there is no case. IMHO.
Peter Hamilton
New Member
- Joined
- May 14, 2006
- Messages
- 3,374
- Reaction score
- 8
LMAo--Lacy is a disgrace--resign!
Peter Hamilton
New Member
- Joined
- May 14, 2006
- Messages
- 3,374
- Reaction score
- 8
Karr wasted everybody's time--lol--this is too funny
SleuthingSleuth
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2006
- Messages
- 251
- Reaction score
- 2
"You can't trust those tests."lilpony said:
Heh.Peter Hamilton
New Member
- Joined
- May 14, 2006
- Messages
- 3,374
- Reaction score
- 8
send Karr to the psycho ward--please--and don't forget to give him his female hormone pills
Hold on just a teensy moment. Everyone proclaiming no DNA match=no case may be absolutely correct, but maybe not. What else is in that 80-90 pages of the arrest warrant? That's what I want to know. As Susan Filan just said on MSNBC, the lack of match for the DNA doesn't absolutely mean game over because there may possibly be other forensic evidence in that arrest warrant.
Maybe I'm just more patient than some, but I'm willing to give Mary Lacy the benefit of the doubt and at least wait to see whether she's going to charge the guy or not.
Maybe I'm just more patient than some, but I'm willing to give Mary Lacy the benefit of the doubt and at least wait to see whether she's going to charge the guy or not.
SleuthingSleuth
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2006
- Messages
- 251
- Reaction score
- 2
Well...it'd be a real kicker if most of that warrant's long pages are just copies of Karr's emails.Louisa said:
JDB
Tybee you will never be forgotten
I have been saying all a long KArr is not the one who did it. he is one Crazy person. I mean after all why would anyone be interested in buying the Klass house. The man needs Help in the biggest way.Louisa said:
cwiz24 said:
Because if they used the DNA in JBR's underwear, it means nothing, IMO. The DNA in the underwear (as has been established ad nauseum) could have come from a factory worker, in which case JMK's DNA would never match. If they used the DNA from under the fingernails (which was incomplete and possibly contaminated due to shoddy forensic work), then the lack of a match also may mean nothing.
Let's wait to see what happens before the dominant RDIs around here start the "I told you so" litany.
If the dna is factory dna or has been transferred accidentally in any other manner, then obviously his dna will not match, as it would not match the killer either!
So there may still be a case, but its looking weak.
.
So there may still be a case, but its looking weak.
.
Patticake
Member
SleuthingSleuth said:"You can't trust those tests."
Where is Berry Schenck when you need him?
aspidistra
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2006
- Messages
- 214
- Reaction score
- 0
OMG. So he is just a nutcase who injected himself into the case, as a lot of people were saying? He really was just researching the case to write a book? And just happens to be a tragic pedophile who wants a sex change operation.lilpony said:
OK then...this is stranger and stranger. It's on CNN now.
Why did John Karr know that the DNA wouldn't match?? Only if he knew he wasn't there?... Quoted in People: "The DNA might not match, but you can't trust the test." What did he mean by that?????