i'm reading Steve Thomas' AND the Ramsey's books alongside each other - i picked up Thomas' by accident, before i heard anything about who he actually was to the case, and i saw that his agenda was clear from the start. I've not decided he's lying, just that he clearly has an agenda.
of course, the R's do, too. doesn't mean that one agenda or the other is misguided - it just is what it is. Thomas could be correct (he's certain PR did it).
my Stupid Question is: why (and how?) is the popular vote STILL against the Ramsey's (PR) if there's DEFINITELY non-family DNA and a man's bootprint at the scene.
thanks,
jfk
of course, the R's do, too. doesn't mean that one agenda or the other is misguided - it just is what it is. Thomas could be correct (he's certain PR did it).
my Stupid Question is: why (and how?) is the popular vote STILL against the Ramsey's (PR) if there's DEFINITELY non-family DNA and a man's bootprint at the scene.
thanks,
jfk