Ok so now the "evil Ramseys" fooled the cops, manipulated the DA and now
these two entirely different people are also on the Ramsey brainwashed payroll of lockstep evil. Really?
Thanks for the details, I really appreciate them. I'm curious how people chose to interpret Joe Barnhill's statement. Although I can imagine that he thought he saw JAR going into the house. Where was JAR? I thought he was eliminated as a suspect pretty quickly since he wasn't in the state?
You may perceive it as JB protecting his son by providing an attorney, I don't. I see him doing the right thing under the advice of the attorney.
However something very important here that is being ignored is that we have a witness who saw a young man going into the Ramsey home. While it is true he would have recognized JAR it's also true that he may have seen someone who looked similar to JAR and just assumed it was JAR. Since we know it could not be JAR why is everyone ignoring the fact that we have a witness who saw someone going into the Ramsey home? I don't get it?
Next, the Stanton scream is very suspicious to me. If Melodie Stanton said she woke up her husband and they sat up together listening to sounds next door, that's not something you'd get confused about later if your neighbor's kid was killed. So again, if we don't interpret everything as the "Evil Ramseys have power over the world" we could look at this as a red flag. In a normal investigation without Ramsey bias, this discrepancy would put the Stanton's high on my list of suspects.
A. They have the access. As neighbors did they attend the Christmas open house? If so they had access to the home. I'd check out to see if they attended the Christmas party.
B. They said it was Jonbenet. That's weird, even if they changed the story to be two days later the woman said it was Jonbenet. She didn't change it to say it was another person. That's odd. If you weren't sure it happened that night and decided it was two days earlier, why would you still say it was Jonbenet? It could have been anyone.
C. They moved out of the neighborhood after the crime. Now there may be an entirely logical explanation for this, (the media being too much) not wanting to live near a crime scene etc. However in many cases where a criminal was caught later, they left right after the crime.
D. IF, if the crime really was a ransom gone wrong, they may have planned to take Jonbenet to their home. This would make more sense than a kidnapper showing up and trying to smuggle Jonbenet out of the home and into a car without being seen.
It's puzzling to me why they weren't investigated more.
More commentary on the scream can be found here.
Who screamed? - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community