Lone trader caused 100 dollar price for oil

Dark Knight

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2004
Messages
21,649
Reaction score
82
A lone trader out to win a little fame made the purchase that took oil prices to the historic 100 dollars a barrel level this week but he lost 600 dollars on the deal, analysts said.

The trader has been named by US and British media as Richard Arens who runs a one man oil brokerage, ABS.

"The magic figure was hit apparently on the back of a single trade, rumoured to be a local intent on fame," Sucden analysts wrote in a commentary Thursday on the record breaking deal.

Arens offered 100,000 dollars on the New York market on Wednesday for 1,000 barrels of oil, producing the much talked of 100 dollars per barrel which sparked anguish across the financial markets.

He later sold on the contract for slightly below 100 dollars, taking a 600 dollar loss.

"It was just for the form; he wanted to be the first in the world to buy oil at 100 dollars," said Antoine Heff, an analyst at NewEdge.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080104/ts_alt_afp/commoditiesoilpriceoffbeat&printer=1
 
Is this what they mean when they say, "More money than sense?"
 
If nations of OPEC seem so intent on raising oil prices why don't we form a OFEC for countries that export food to these desert dwellers? It seems to me that they need food just as much, if not more, than we need their oil.

From what I understand you can't grow crops in the sand. :)
 
If nations of OPEC seem so intent on raising oil prices why don't we form a OFEC for countries that export food to these desert dwellers? It seems to me that they need food just as much, if not more, than we need their oil.

From what I understand you can't grow crops in the sand. :)

Have you ever read Frederick Pohl's 1980 sci-fi novel, JEM? In it, he imagines a near-future world divided into just such blocks: fuel, food and "people" (the latter being the block that provides manual labors to the other two). The alignment makes for strange (to us at the time) allies: the U.S. and Bulgaria (food), Norway and Saudi Arabia (fuel), China and Pakistan (people).
 
If nations of OPEC seem so intent on raising oil prices why don't we form a OFEC for countries that export food to these desert dwellers? It seems to me that they need food just as much, if not more, than we need their oil.

From what I understand you can't grow crops in the sand. :)

Yes, but the powerful people in some countries don't care how much food all of the people have, so it's not as much of a bargaining chip as one might think.
 
Yes, but the powerful people in some countries don't care how much food all of the people have, so it's not as much of a bargaining chip as one might think.

They might care when enough hungry people hunt them down.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
218
Guests online
1,285
Total visitors
1,503

Forum statistics

Threads
591,773
Messages
17,958,620
Members
228,604
Latest member
leannamj
Back
Top