934 users online (250 members and 684 guests)  


Websleuths News
Trending Stories

Where is 5-year-old Lucas Hernandez?

Alexandra Brueger shot and killed while jogging but did she know her killer?

Jennifer Hart was drunk when she drove off a cliff killing her wife and six kids. Everyone wants to know Why!

Trials

Aliayah Lunsford has been missing since 2011; her mother is on trial for her murder

Bill Cosby re-trial is underway

Trial of two men accused in slaying of Becky Friedli, 18, Vicki, 53, & Jon Hayward, 55 in Pinyon Pines is underway.



Page 1 of 104 1 2 3 11 51 101 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 1558
  1. 07-09-2008, 02:44 PM #1
    Morag
    Morag is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,644

    The Ramseys are Cleared

    According to KUSA, the entire Ramsey has been cleared due to DNA evidence from Jon Benet's underwear.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 07-09-2008, 02:45 PM #2
    LadyLuck
    LadyLuck is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    2,807
    Fox news was just reporting this. The DNA found does not match anyone in the family or the police data base.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 07-09-2008, 02:50 PM #3
    angelwngs's Avatar
    angelwngs
    angelwngs is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    4,986
    This is ABSURD!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 07-09-2008, 02:52 PM #4
    becklynn
    becklynn is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    501
    That DNA could have come from a factory worker in China. This is an awfully bold statement and simply not true. My Opinion Only
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 07-09-2008, 02:52 PM #5
    Spazkat9696
    Spazkat9696 is offline Former Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,468
    Quote Originally Posted by angelwngs View Post
    This is ABSURD!

    Why??
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  6. 07-09-2008, 02:53 PM #6
    MrsMush99
    MrsMush99 is offline Former Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    7,398
    I thought we already knew that the DNA didn't match anyone in the family????? Am I going crazy here? Wouldn't they have already know YEARS ago that the DNA did not match?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 07-09-2008, 02:54 PM #7
    nanandjim
    nanandjim is offline Former Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    16,107
    This is ridiculous. It is foreign, male DNA on a legging. What form was the DNA? If it is foreign semen, I would agree else I don't believe it. I guess that Boulder is moving on...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 07-09-2008, 02:54 PM #8
    MrsMush99
    MrsMush99 is offline Former Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    7,398
    Oh I see, it's NEW DNA evidence. Where did this new DNA evidence come from?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 07-09-2008, 02:55 PM #9
    Spazkat9696
    Spazkat9696 is offline Former Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,468
    Quote Originally Posted by MrsMush99 View Post
    I thought we already knew that the DNA didn't match anyone in the family????? Am I going crazy here? Wouldn't they have already know YEARS ago that the DNA did not match?

    The news says they found DNA to match the DNA in her underwear on her tights. Because she was re-dressed they say that that DNA must belong to whomever did this.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 07-09-2008, 02:55 PM #10
    Ciara's Avatar
    Ciara
    Ciara is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,814
    Quote Originally Posted by MrsMush99 View Post
    I thought we already knew that the DNA didn't match anyone in the family????? Am I going crazy here? Wouldn't they have already know YEARS ago that the DNA did not match?
    Thats what I thought too Mrs Mush
    Rest in Peace Baby P xx
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 07-09-2008, 02:56 PM #11
    Spazkat9696
    Spazkat9696 is offline Former Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,468
    Quote Originally Posted by nanandjim View Post
    This is ridiculous. It is foreign, male DNA on a legging. What form was the DNA? If it is foreign semen, I would agree else I don't believe it. I guess that Boulder is moving on...

    Skin cells on the waist band
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 07-09-2008, 02:56 PM #12
    Medea
    Medea is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    698
    Quote Originally Posted by MrsMush99 View Post
    I thought we already knew that the DNA didn't match anyone in the family????? Am I going crazy here? Wouldn't they have already know YEARS ago that the DNA did not match?

    That's what I thought. Everyone already knew the DNA was unknown.

    Still doens't explain the rest of the crime scene.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 07-09-2008, 02:57 PM #13
    Rino
    Rino is offline Former Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,537
    Quote Originally Posted by Spazkat9696 View Post
    The news says they found DNA to match the DNA in her underwear on her tights. Because she was re-dressed they say that that DNA must belong to whomever did this.
    How could they do that when there is not match in the police data base?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 07-09-2008, 02:58 PM #14
    angelwngs's Avatar
    angelwngs
    angelwngs is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    4,986
    Quote Originally Posted by Spazkat9696 View Post
    Why??
    Just because the dna does not match any of the Ramsey family does not mean that they are innocent in the murder of JBR. The dna found could have been on the undies prior to JBR ever wearing them. To announce that the Ramseys are "cleared" implies, at the very least, that they are innocent, which I will never believe.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 07-09-2008, 02:58 PM #15
    fran's Avatar
    fran
    fran is offline Former Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    32,578
    Ok, I haven't followed this case very closely through the years. But to those who have always felt the Ramseys were responsible. Wouldn't this change your mind?

    I mean, they're saying the DNA on the leggings matches what was found in the underwear, and that DNA doesn't match anyone in the Ramsey family.

    IMO, it appears the Ramseys are innocent.

    Just wondering,
    fran
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 1 of 104 1 2 3 11 51 101 ... LastLast
« Daily Camera article...Thanks to Greenleaf at FFJ! | Tonight websleuths on the carol espy show kdka »


Similar Threads

  1. The Ramseys are no longer “cleared” according to Stan Garnett
    By cynic in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 93
    Last Post: 02-04-2011, 01:43 PM
  2. IF They Are Cleared..
    By daffodil in forum Madeleine McCann
    Replies: 99
    Last Post: 11-05-2007, 06:32 AM
  3. Is he only cleared because of DNA?
    By OceanEyes in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-28-2006, 11:47 PM
  4. Who's really been cleared?
    By Voice of Reason in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-08-2006, 05:51 PM
  5. Cleared on DNA
    By Jayelles in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 07-07-2004, 06:55 PM

Tags for this Thread