SeriouslySearching
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2007
- Messages
- 35,527
- Reaction score
- 262
Please continue here...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
any children from that union?FWIW, MJ was divorced from a previous wife at around the time of his 1993 conviction.
Divorce records 11 Aug 1992 (Rutland)
SUPI
Registered User Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 131
I just wanted to say.....
I have just spent the last week reading everything I found on the site. I have read every posting and every thread. I have done a lot of thinking about this case and this poor child. There are a lot of things that are evident about what has happened and I'm sure the whole nasty story will come out in detail soon or at least during a trial. There are no words that I can find to express the disgust I feel for the happenings that brought the end to a young, blameless life.
One of the things that stands out strongly to me is the complete lack of care and supervision that has been shown by almost every adult in this sick family. I do not understand anyones expressed feelings for the perp and his friends. I do not understand how AR could have been left to the mercies of these pigs and not have anyone else notice. Mommy says she keeps close watch on her children. And yet allows the association of her precious child with a known sexual offender. I'm sure she allowed all of her children to be with this "Uncle".
Of course the ultimate responsibility belongs to the one who killed her. There is however, others who did nothing and by that lack of action allowed this to happen. These people must have the IQ of turnips to not see what was going on right in their own homes and families. It is hard for me to accept that the association of these perverts with their children was "no big deal".
This is another reason that these people need to be locked up forever. If parents, who are informed of the crimes of those around their kids, allow the association, then the state must make sure it can't happen. There is no cure for this and so for our children's safty they must be removed from society.
I want you all to know how much I have appreciated all of the work you have put into finding out the facts. I am very sorry that the news people haven't been on top of this story. America needs to wake up to the danger that these people represent to our children and thus to our society. Those that are not caught and put away will hurt untold number of children who grow up and hurt others possibly. The work that has been done on this sad story, on this site, is important for the future of our children. Let's hope that the deaths of our precious children, such as Jessica and Brooke will save other children from their fate.
I will be back tomorrow to check into any developments and to help all of you find out the facts. I need to digest and get over being so mad as much as I can so I can think clearly. I just wanted to let you know how much I appreciate all of you and your hard work
Babe I am a little worried about your mom and dad. I have been hearing some rumors that your mom has done some thinking about divorcing your dad. God honey that can't happen. I would be so, so sad if that happened. And your poor dad doesn't deserve that after everything he has done for you and your mom and [ ]. In my opinion he has given all of you a great life and nobody should have anything to complain about. Your mom has been taking some phone calls from your FATHER and I guess she hasn't done anything with him recently....
I think the redactions in the affidavits cause some of the confusion . If some of those redactions are magnified by 300% it is possible to see that the word "dad" has been blocked from many passages. Keeping this revelation in mind helps to clarify many emails.
Another problem causing confusion is grammar; it is difficult at times to know who is being addressing when someone makes a statement such as this:
Because the word "dad" is always typed in small letters throughout the email correspondence from 8 May - 26 June, I believe we can infer that FATHER in the above paragraph is a reference to someone other than "dad".
I believe this distinction is important to keep in mind when trying to understand the dynamic between AR, Denise and MJ, as well as C and E.
Law Enforcement's belief that C and E are both MJ has been clearly stated. However it is very hard for me to understand how AR could be "in love" with E, could be terrorized by C, and could not have met C nor E, and -- moreover to have nurtured a belief that "dad" was neither C, nor E.
dad refers to stepfather MJ, father refers to her biological father, when she says she was with someone else from the program but was too drugged to recognize them i believe it was MJ doing so to convince her of the "reality" of the "program", and i think it is likely he pretended to be C, the world travelling adventurer with a deep love for AR that looked forward to someday (after her training) being together with her.
Did I miss something, I was looking for the interview that for bio-dad did from his home where I thought he said,(Brooke was looking forward to the trip to see her ex-stepfather) I can not find it. While looking I found her myspace page and she list her age as 14?, and states she loves cj, any thoughts on this.
I think the redactions in the affidavits cause some of the confusion . If some of those redactions are magnified by 300% it is possible to see that the word "dad" has been blocked from many passages. Keeping this revelation in mind helps to clarify many emails.
Another problem causing confusion is grammar; it is difficult at times to know who is being addressing when someone makes a statement such as this:
Because the word "dad" is always typed in small letters throughout the email correspondence from 8 May - 26 June, I believe we can infer that FATHER in the above paragraph is a reference to someone other than "dad".
I believe this distinction is important to keep in mind when trying to understand the dynamic between AR, Denise and MJ, as well as C and E.
Law Enforcement's belief that C and E are both MJ has been clearly stated. However it is very hard for me to understand how AR could be "in love" with E, could be terrorized by C, and could not have met C nor E, and -- moreover to have nurtured a belief that "dad" was neither C, nor E.
I can't remember where, (Savanah's page?), but somewhere in their circle of friends on Myspace there is a CJ, looked like he was in Texas. Somebody she knew from her visits there? I don't think that page (that said "in love with CJ") had been changed in a long time, so doubtful that MJ wrote that to throw people off. i think that is the account that her bio dad banned her from using & changed the password some time back.
liljim, I agree. However I believe that E is the "world travelling adventurer" and that C is someone who is supposedly higher up in Breckenridge, perhaps the "president". (I do not believe a reference to US President holds). It seems clear to me when AR seeks C's assistance through the "phone company" that AR is clearly separating C from E in some sort of heirarchy.
I think that 14 is the minimum age requirement to have a Myspace account. This particular account is probably the one that her bio dad shut down. I wonder why he didn't just delete it. If she states that she is in love witha "CJ." This could be the reason that she was visiting TX. I figured that her pedophile ex-stepfather showered her with gifts and attention; and that was her reason for wanting to visit. Maybe, it was for both reasons.Did I miss something, I was looking for the interview that for bio-dad did from his home where I thought he said,(Brooke was looking forward to the trip to see her ex-stepfather) I can not find it. While looking I found her myspace page and she list her age as 14?, and states she loves cj, any thoughts on this.
...I know she is a victim of all of this and I may get slapped around for saying this but some of her e-mails made her seem as if she were as manipulative as the others.
This was posted this morning in Up to the Minute Section The Establishment Paedophile: How a Monster hid in High Society it is everywhere...there are so many of these sick #@%$s out there! Look how much time he rec'd Long disturbing article at link.
Roger Took was sentenced this February to a minimum of four and a half years in prison as part of an indeterminate sentence for 17 other crimes relating to child abuse.