Brooke Bennett, 12 years old Randolph VT #20

Status
Not open for further replies.

christine2448

Retired WS Staff
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
10,390
Reaction score
281
Please continue GENERAL discussions here. Look around BROOKE'S FORUM there are several threads started on specific topics to try and stay organized.

I advise everyone to read the RULES of WS, Long and Short Version and also to read THIS STICKY before participating. TIA.


Links to previous and similar threads can be found toward the bottom of the page.

Welcome all newbies!!!!!!!!!!!! :blowkiss: I am sad such a tragedy is bringing us all together.
 
Great, :banghead: I just lost a longgg post. lol
Again, AR has been a victim, of sexual abuse since the age of 8.
It is against the TOS to bash her and I am not afraid to hit the alert button. :blush:

How dare people HERE question if Brooke was sexually active.
Wt is wrong with people? She was only12 years old.

Do gossip mongers have a son or daughter 12 years old?? Think about it.:mad:
I find this infuriating.

My comments are regarding post made yesterday.
 
There is something off with the entire mugshot thing. The only thing I can figure is that the Feds do not want someone(s) to see his face and tip them off. If RG was involved someway in a larger operation, he may not have used his real name...but people might recognize his face, react and get rid of their computers, drives, etc.
Something is way off, hopefully we will learn the "why" soon!
 
And it was on July 12th MJ was convicted, two years prior to Brookes birth
Conviction Information

Sexual Offense Conviction(s) Date of Conviction 07-12-1993

* AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT
* KIDNAPPING



OMG,.. I didn't even realize that two years before her birthday he was convicted!
 
And it was on July 12th MJ was convicted, two years prior to Brookes birth
Conviction Information

Sexual Offense Conviction(s) Date of Conviction 07-12-1993

* AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT
* KIDNAPPING



OMG,.. I didn't even realize that two years before her birthday he was convicted!
Yes, I guess I could have not mentioned that, but it was listed on his Vermont Registry records that no longer are there!

Here is what WAS there:
http://170.222.137.2:8080/sor/servlet/SOR?id=X000005393

VERMONT SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY
INFORMATION

State of Vermont | Vermont Department of Public Safety | Division of Criminal Justice Services
Registry Detail

(http://170.222.137.2:8080/sor/images/X000005393.jpeg)

Registrant Information

Name: JACQUES,MICHAEL STEPHEN
Date of Birth: 03-18-1966
City: RANDOLPH CENTER
Sex: M
Race: W
Height: 5 feet 08 inches
Weight: 150 lbs
Eye Color: BLU
Hair Color: BRO

Treatment Status: COMPLIANT
Wanted: NO

Reason For Internet Posting
Conviction For Aggravated Sexual Assault

Department Of Corrections
Supervising Office & Phone#
No longer supervised for sexual crime

Conviction Information
Sexual Offense Conviction(s) Date of Conviction
AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT [SIZE=+0]07-12-1993 [/SIZE][SIZE=+0]
KIDNAPPING [/SIZE]07-12-1993

Vermont Sex Offender Registry Home Page
Department of Public Safety Home | State of Vermont Home Page | Email Webmaster
Copyright 2004 The Vermont Department of Public Safety - All rights reserved -
Database as of: Jun 28 2008 at 01:00 am











 
It being Brooke's 13th birthday, I am so sorry she is not here to enjoy it. It is so sad.
Brooke was such an innocent victim.

Hailiejade, I hope it is next July 12 when MJ is convicted and sent to death row.
 
Has LE, a reporter, a local, a relative, anyone explained why no recent pictures of MG are available? What about his mug shot? I can't find a picture of him anywhere.
 
It being Brooke's 13th birthday, I am so sorry she is not here to enjoy it. It is so sad.
Brooke was such an innocent victim.

Hailiejade, I hope it is next July 12 when MJ is convicted and sent to death row.

And then maybe another July 12th he will be PUT TO DEATH!:woohoo:
 
Has LE, a reporter, a local, a relative, anyone explained why no recent pictures of MG are available? What about his mug shot? I can't find a picture of him anywhere.

You mean RG?

I posted about RG before the new thread was started. I don't think I was supposed to - those posts should have been on the RG thread, I think.

Too many different threads! I did not mean to post where I may not should have!
 
Yes, I guess I could have not mentioned that, but it was listed on his Vermont Registry records that no longer are there!

Here is what WAS there:
http://170.222.137.2:8080/sor/servlet/SOR?id=X000005393

VERMONT SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY
INFORMATION

State of Vermont | Vermont Department of Public Safety | Division of Criminal Justice Services
Registry Detail

(http://170.222.137.2:8080/sor/images/X000005393.jpeg)

Registrant Information

Name: JACQUES,MICHAEL STEPHEN
Date of Birth: 03-18-1966
City: RANDOLPH CENTER
Sex: M
Race: W
Height: 5 feet 08 inches
Weight: 150 lbs
Eye Color: BLU
Hair Color: BRO

Treatment Status: COMPLIANT
Wanted: NO

Reason For Internet Posting
Conviction For Aggravated Sexual Assault

Department Of Corrections
Supervising Office & Phone#
No longer supervised for sexual crime

Conviction Information
Sexual Offense Conviction(s) Date of Conviction
AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT [SIZE=+0]07-12-1993 [/SIZE][SIZE=+0]
KIDNAPPING [/SIZE]07-12-1993

Vermont Sex Offender Registry Home Page
Department of Public Safety Home | State of Vermont Home Page | Email Webmaster
Copyright 2004 The Vermont Department of Public Safety - All rights reserved -
Database as of: Jun 28 2008 at 01:00 am

Thanks, Tom'sGirl, for posting that. I had 'saved' that also, only to go back and see that it was gone.
Talk about travesty of justice! That was out walking free to be able to do even worse!
 
You mean RG?

I posted about RG before the new thread was started. I don't think I was supposed to - those posts should have been on the RG thread, I think.

Too many different threads! I did not mean to post where I may not should have!

Now honey you did just fine.
:blowkiss:
I'm trying to play catch up from yesterday.
 
Something is way off, hopefully we will learn the "why" soon!
Yes, it is way off. It reminds me of the Stacy Peterson case and LE hiding Tom...but the difference is that we know Tom is a state's witness. Are they going to let Ray Gagnon walk on this if he gives them the information that will put MJ up to face the DP?!
 
Yes, it is way off. It reminds me of the Peterson case and LE hiding Tom...but the difference is that we know Tom is a state's witness. Are they going to let Ray Gagnon walk on this if he gives them the information that will put MJ up to face the DP?!


Let's hope not.
Imo, RG is in this up to his eyeballs.
He knew what the creep was going to do to Brooke...he's an accessary after the fact if not someone who allowed a 12 year old to be murdered.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
171
Guests online
1,107
Total visitors
1,278

Forum statistics

Threads
589,940
Messages
17,927,972
Members
228,009
Latest member
chrsrb10
Back
Top