fran
Former Member
Wouldn't this be considered an invasion of privacy? After all, it's not the friends who are being called before the judge, it's the NOT suspect Bradley Cooper. It has to do with him being UNFIT to care for the two children. IMO, it would be HIS and NANCY's phone records and such that would be under question.
I think this is going too far.
What do you think?
fran
PS...I just posted this on the media thread...
http://www.newsobserver.com/2864/story/1214870.html
Friends asked to back up statements
Friends of Nancy Cooper have been asked to prove everything they have claimed about Nancy Cooper's troubled marriage to her husband Bradley.
According to court records, attorneys for Bradley Cooper have ordered his wife's friends to turn over their diaries, appointment books, phone records, pictures and anything else that might back up statements they made in affidavits filed after Nancy Cooper's death. Friends claimed that Bradley Cooper was emotionally unstable, unfaithful and had been very controlling and demeaning of his wife.
I think this is going too far.
What do you think?
fran
PS...I just posted this on the media thread...
http://www.newsobserver.com/2864/story/1214870.html
Friends asked to back up statements
Friends of Nancy Cooper have been asked to prove everything they have claimed about Nancy Cooper's troubled marriage to her husband Bradley.
According to court records, attorneys for Bradley Cooper have ordered his wife's friends to turn over their diaries, appointment books, phone records, pictures and anything else that might back up statements they made in affidavits filed after Nancy Cooper's death. Friends claimed that Bradley Cooper was emotionally unstable, unfaithful and had been very controlling and demeaning of his wife.