Found Deceased CA - Charles Hamrick, 49, El Segundo, 8 April 2003

New Posts

christine2448

christine2448

Retired WS Staff
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
10,392
Reaction score
330
I do not see a physical resemblance.


RK can you do a side by side for us?


I would think someone missing would be more apt to lose weight then gain 30+ lbs in 5 months..but I guess it could be possible.

Also, stats aren't always correct.


I'd like to see a side by side.
 
hamrick_charles_william.jpg
 
christine2448 said:
I do not see a physical resemblance.


RK can you do a side by side for us?


I would think someone missing would be more apt to lose weight then gain 30+ lbs in 5 months..but I guess it could be possible.

Also, stats aren't always correct.


I'd like to see a side by side.
Click to expand...

He went missing 1 year, 4 mths. prior to Bk being found.
 
RK, did you check out my side by on BK and Udow, did ok? Next time I will do a little larger if it looks good.
 
I did another side by side, using different photo's
 

Attachments

  • bk and hamrick side by.bmp
    673.6 KB · Views: 84
Ok, I think I stretched the faces to much, it'll take time, I'll try again on someone else, but it does give a good idea since all the faces are stretched.
 
IMO, no, the ears. Is it possible to find out if the pictures we have of Ben are at the weight of 210? and not at 240, when he was found. I am assuming that the pics we have are at about 210-220 lbs.
 
Possible. Probably not.
Ears are not same size as Bk's. Nose is a little longer.
70 percent no.
 
I don't believe it is a match either, JMO....Bk does have quite distinguishing features, especially the ears, and the nose is quite different as well.

If there is a few good photos or atleast one really good photo, of a missing person it is usually pretty easy to rule in or out when comparing to BK, mostly because of the ears.

If you really study the ears of BK in every photo they are definately not very common in appearance.
 
carolwood said:
IMO, no, the ears. Is it possible to find out if the pictures we have of Ben are at the weight of 210? and not at 240, when he was found. I am assuming that the pics we have are at about 210-220 lbs.
Click to expand...

BK weighs 240 now.
 
Im sorry I do not think that this is a match

Just one thing that stands out the most for me that can not change through weight loss

Look at the area between the nose and the top lip

Benjamin Kyles is so much WIDER than the missing mans

Lots of other things also do not match but this one can not be changed by weight loss/gain etc
 
The man's nose is much broader at the tip than BK's and less defined. His nostrils are hidden from view in the head-on shot by the tip of his nose, and BK' are visible and sculptured. Not a match IMO.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 214 more.
Total: 4,009 (members: 215, guests: 3,794)

Online statistics

Members online
215
Guests online
3,794
Total visitors
4,009
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
591,697
Messages
17,957,628
Members
228,588
Latest member
cariboucampfire73
Back
Top