why_nutt
New Member
It will be repeated again at 2 a.m. Eastern time.
This is not a repeat of any of the old documentaries in any form.
This is not a repeat of any of the old documentaries in any form.
why_nutt said:It will be repeated again at 2 a.m. Eastern time.
This is not a repeat of any of the old documentaries in any form.
Yes, I noticed that. I also noticed that the Ramsey private investigator, Dave Williams, invented some new evidence. He said there was evidence that the grate was moved and barks and twigs cleared from around the basement window where the "intruder" came in. Rewriting history, are they?why_nutt said:By all that is holy, I have to make screen grabs. I could swear they just showed that the packing peanuts were still in the window well when Bill Kurtis was there years later.
why_nutt said:By all that is holy, I have to make screen grabs. I could swear they just showed that the packing peanuts were still in the window well when Bill Kurtis was there years later.
I agree, Ned. It was a pretty good show except for the lie about the basement window "evidence."Nedthan Johns said:I had a good chuckle because Alex Hunter came off as an arrogant *advertiser censored**
The program was extremely neutral, however I was able to really focus in on Patsy's and John's emotions and body language. When asked directly about JonBenet, John Ramsey shifts his eyes. Patsy when spoken to, emphatically denies they had everything to do with it, while blinking her eyes and shifting her body. The body language is interesting and at NO time do either parents show ANY emotion regarding their child.
The program clearly defined the Ramsey's were not cooperating with police.
Britt said:An epiphany moment: when John made reference to proper burial. Sent chills. I'm now thinking John helped compose the ransom note. Either that or he's incredibly, self-sabotagingly stupid. Come to think of it, I can't decide which. What do you think?
Arielle said:I think it is just possible that after having been exposed to the note so many times, that it is sort of second nature to use some of those phrases.
Edited to add: Wish I had seen this program. What was it called? I might just see if I can find it somewhere.
I've heard that rationale before and I don't buy it and here's why: IF this was a real intruder-crime and that monster wrote those words to the parent of the murdered child, IMO those words, every last one of them, would be seared into the parent's memory in all their nightmarish, revolting horror, to the extent that the parent would go out of his way to avoid ever uttering them. In other words, IMO the parent would have the exact opposite reaction to the words as you suggest above.... he would literally choke on the words.Arielle said:I think it is just possible that after having been exposed to the note so many times, that it is sort of second nature to use some of those phrases.
TLynn said:I haven't seen this "new" program - but I remember John Ramsey using "proper burial" way back when - one of their first TV interviews. It caught my attention at that time.
Was this a clip from back then or a new interview for the documentary?