what do you hope a second autopsy should investigate?
I ask for a cease-fire between the IDI and RDI and compose a list
So what do we hope to discover with a second autopsy, if the body is still in good condition?
1 stun gun marks? (i.e biopsy lesions)
2 "chronic" sexual abuse
3 whether she clawed at the ligature? (some bruising under ligature)
4- whether head blow or strangulation came first, if even possible
5 - "touch" DNA
assuming of course the corpse is not in such a state of decay.
if you wish, add details about how this will support your IDI or RDI theory and how it would affect if both are present.
which objects such as the ligature would you want tested for touch DNA?
i.e stun gun marks imply IDI, chronic sexual abuse imply RDI.
I ask for a cease-fire between the IDI and RDI and compose a list
Not on the garrote. As some always choose to remind us, the Rs SHOULD have no connection with it at all. Otherwise, I'm inclined to agree.
Right.
EXACTLY!
NOW you're talking my language! Although, by now I doubt there'd be enough left for testing either.
So what do we hope to discover with a second autopsy, if the body is still in good condition?
1 stun gun marks? (i.e biopsy lesions)
2 "chronic" sexual abuse
3 whether she clawed at the ligature? (some bruising under ligature)
4- whether head blow or strangulation came first, if even possible
5 - "touch" DNA
assuming of course the corpse is not in such a state of decay.
if you wish, add details about how this will support your IDI or RDI theory and how it would affect if both are present.
which objects such as the ligature would you want tested for touch DNA?
i.e stun gun marks imply IDI, chronic sexual abuse imply RDI.