LOL, you mean defense has come to a decision that they want another judge? I thought they were using a daisy to decide that. We don't want this judge, this judge is ok, we don't want this judge.... I thought there would be more petals.
Ok, so the decision is that they don't want this judge, they are special. They want to pick their own judge. They want to name their own judge, something that no other accused suspect is allowed to do. My question is, will they come out next week and bring out the daisy again and say ok, we don't want that particular judge???
Little Joey keeps talking about how DrewP can't get a fair trial due to pre-trial publicity. But I do think it is funny. I have heard from family (his and hers), and I have heard from friends (his and hers), I have heard from JB and from DrewP. But I haven't heard from the prosecution. As far as what I have heard from, the noise from DrewP and JB have talked as much or more than from anyone else. But now they want a virgin jury that hasn't heard about the case, I do hope the judge takes that into consideration when they consider the motion to move the case. DrewP and JB have talked longer and louder than anyone else in the pretrial publicity.
Glascow is wanting a gag order. That is bad for us, as it will severely reduce the info we hear about the case. And while I do understand it, I hope it doesn't happen. A couple of things I would like to point out though. The prosecution seems to be more concerned about DrewP's ability to get a jury that hasn't heard about the case than the defense is. The prosecution is accusing the defense of releasing undisclosed info about the case, including witnesses names. The prosecution is now accusing the defense of preferential treatment of DrewP. Is DrewP's defense going to be "ineffective counsel?" At some point, will someone please make a complaint to the bar about this alleged defense counsel?
