BlueCrab
New Member
Patsy didn't do it.
Even though her coat fibers are in the knot of the ligature device found around JonBenet's neck, and on the sticky side of the black duct tape found on JonBenet's mouth, and she was deeply involved in the staging and is involved in the coverup, Patsy Ramsey did not kill JonBenet. Here's why:
1. The foreign DNA in JonBenet's underwear is from a male. Patsy is a female.
2. The government's six handwriting examiners, the only ones who had all of the exemplars and the original note to study, all say Patsy didn't likely write the ransom note.
3. Gelb's private lie-detector examinations concluded that Patsy did not kill JonBenet nor did she write the ransom note.
4. The grand jury, with almost unlimited power to investigate anything and anyone it wanted, using its own hand-picked team of investigators, and after 13 months of investigating, was unable to come up with even one item of evidence that might indict Patsy Ramsey.
The evidence is convincing that Patsy didn't do it, but it's also convincing that a Ramsey had to have been directly involved in the death of JonBenet. Otherwise, there wouldn't have been a need for the staging and the continuing coverup. So who are they covering for?
JMO
Even though her coat fibers are in the knot of the ligature device found around JonBenet's neck, and on the sticky side of the black duct tape found on JonBenet's mouth, and she was deeply involved in the staging and is involved in the coverup, Patsy Ramsey did not kill JonBenet. Here's why:
1. The foreign DNA in JonBenet's underwear is from a male. Patsy is a female.
2. The government's six handwriting examiners, the only ones who had all of the exemplars and the original note to study, all say Patsy didn't likely write the ransom note.
3. Gelb's private lie-detector examinations concluded that Patsy did not kill JonBenet nor did she write the ransom note.
4. The grand jury, with almost unlimited power to investigate anything and anyone it wanted, using its own hand-picked team of investigators, and after 13 months of investigating, was unable to come up with even one item of evidence that might indict Patsy Ramsey.
The evidence is convincing that Patsy didn't do it, but it's also convincing that a Ramsey had to have been directly involved in the death of JonBenet. Otherwise, there wouldn't have been a need for the staging and the continuing coverup. So who are they covering for?
JMO