John Ramsey is a complete joke. I disregard anything his hired guns may say in relation to his not being involved in his daughter's death. After so many years, this is the best statement he could muster up to find out what happened? With all of his money, has this man does one single thing to help others in similar situations?
Some questions and explanations that John Ramsey should answer, if he even could.
- Ransom note came from their own stationary (pen and paper from their own home). Explain that one John. I know it's an everyday thing where an intruder(s) comes so unprepared that they need to grab one of your own pens and... might as well grab the paper too as they forgot that. Most of these criminals just love to stay inside a victim's house for over two hours deciding what to write for ransom at a multi-millionaire's house, who for all they know could have been littered and surrounded with cameras. Does this make sense?
- JonBenet was found murdered in their own home. So much for the ransom, I guess. But they left it anyway.
- No sign of any forced entry whatsoever.
- John Ramsey let everybody inside the house after he discovered JonBenet in the basement, was this intentional?
- The ransom demand was approximate to the bonuses he received from the company he worked for (Access Graphics).
- Ramsey's moved to Atlanta shortly after the murder. Time to get outta Dodge?
- "Lawyered Up" almost immediately.
- Ranson note must have taken at least a couple of hours to complete (stationary was from their own home).
- As Robert Ressler, former FBI profiler, stated it best on this case: it would be the first time ever that a ransom note was left behind in a crime scene at a victim's own home where the person you are supposed to be holding for ransom is deceased. It has never happened before.
- Patsy Ramsay referred to her daughter by saying "I loved that child". That child? Actually, that is your daughter. Not "that child".
- Has John Ramsey or Patsy before she passed away ever given a complete and thorough interview relating to this case? I know they both hid a lot and refused to answer many questions or even give a full lie detector test without setting the rules as to what they could be asked, but why? Wouldn't they want to clear themselves and place the police direction where it belongs, if it isn't them?
I could understand if one of the things mentioned as just a coincidence. But all of these? No way. They must be the two most unlucky people to ever come down the pike. Just goes to show how far money can go. Now, it's probably too late to ever find out what happened.