Identified! NV - Henderson, 'Arroyo Grande', WhtFem UP46, "S" tattoo, Oct'80*GRAPHIC* - Tammy Corrine Terrell

Status
Not open for further replies.
If she had a vaccination scar, she was born prior to 1967. My sister was born jan 67 and has no scar, I was born earlier and I have one.
 
If she had a vaccination scar, she was born prior to 1967. My sister was born jan 67 and has no scar, I was born earlier and I have one.

Can not find that one.....
 
Patricia Taylor has been officially ruled out as Arroyo Grande Jane Doe.
 
I have not seen these names ruled out yet,

Lucinda Schaefer- Height is off a bit and the picture is hard to see.
https://www.findthemissing.org/en/cases/4571/153

Angela Meeker- Height and weight on point, not sold on a photo comparison, plus she has a mole
http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/1351dfwa.html

Roxanne Sims- Height is off a few inches, went missing 3 years before doe was found. Same shape nose though
https://www.findthemissing.org/en/cases/13086/98

Roxanne has DNA, Lucinda has dentals. Angela is in NamUs with DNA available too. They can be easily checked for rule out.
 
I have not seen these names ruled out yet,

Lucinda Schaefer- Height is off a bit and the picture is hard to see.
https://www.findthemissing.org/en/cases/4571/153


Angela Meeker- Height and weight on point, not sold on a photo comparison, plus she has a mole
http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/1351dfwa.html

Roxanne Sims- Height is off a few inches, went missing 3 years before doe was found. Same shape nose though
https://www.findthemissing.org/en/cases/13086/98

Lucinda was supposed to be killed by the discusting tool box killers...somewhere in CA https://andtheywere.wordpress.com/2016/05/07/lucinda-lynn-schaefer/
 
And great news! Per the Henderson PD FB page, isotope testing has been scheduled!
 


She's been exhumed again. The link that's provided in the story linked the old story, not the update, but I'm posting the FB page if you scroll through it to get the latest video.
https://www.facebook.com/FOX5Vegas/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED&fref=nf

To link directly to a FB post, there is a date/ time on every post, this one is Yesterday at 2:36am. Right click, copy link location or select open in new tab, copy the URL

FOX5 Las Vegas posted Yesterday at 2:36am ·

UPDATE: Detectives exhumed the body of Jane Arroyo Grande Doe - the young woman found slain in Henderson back in 1980. They said new tips came in following this report: http://www.fox5vegas.com/story/33708261/jane-arroyo-grande-does-identity-key-in-solving-her-killing

Share this post to help solve this cold case.
 
Gotcha! Thanks, Rose! That's the update I wanted to post but couldn't figure it out. You rock.

Welcome, thanks for letting us know!

And great news! Per the Henderson PD FB page, isotope testing has been scheduled!

Here is the link to the post on Henderson PD FB; so glad they're doing isotopes!

Henderson Police Department shared FOX5 Las Vegas's video. 22 hrs ago·

Share this story with your dentist and orthodontist. He or she may hold the key to finding Jane Arroyo Grande Doe's real name and family.

Thank you Cyndi Lundeberg and FOX5 Las Vegas for keeping her story alive.

SMA - Just curious, are you also going to do isotope testing on her as well? · 21 hrs
Henderson Police Department Hi SMA, yes, isotope testing has been scheduled. 21 hrs
 
I updated her page with the post from the Henderson Police Department as well as a new article. The NCMEC recon with the darker eyes surprised me a bit, but nothing else was changed.

Here's the link, likes & shares are greatly appreciated:
https://www.facebook.com/NVJaneDoe/?fref=ts

I hope 2017 will be her year!
 
Does anyone know why NCMEC is not listing Arroyo among the other "Jane Does" on the site, but instead has her as listed "Unknown" in the "missing children" search? Sahara Sue and Walker County Janes are both listed in the Jane Does.
 
Does anyone know why NCMEC is not listing Arroyo among the other "Jane Does" on the site, but instead has her as listed "Unknown" in the "missing children" search? Sahara Sue and Walker County Janes are both listed in the Jane Does.

Best suggestion would be to PM their FB page to ask why it says unknown and not Jane Doe on her profile.
If you go back to that one post I made where I pasted in the old articles, he said she was the 1st Jane Doe listed online, he thought he would get people yelling but instead people asked if she was their loved one. I think she was the 1st one listed on NCMEC too, before they started using Jane Doe. She's #46 on NamUs

Nevada coroner puts photos of deceased on Internet / Visitors urged to try to help identify Jane and John Does - By Steve Friess, Special to The Chronicle Published 4:00 am, Thursday, January 22, 2004

2004-01-22 04:00:00 PDT Las Vegas -- Her naked corpse was discovered by accident by a pair of brothers more than 23 years ago along a dirt road on the edge of town. She looked like a teen, perhaps no older than 18, possibly a runaway. Her head was beaten with a hammer, but the coroner believes she actually died from stabbings of an unidentified 3-inch object.

The murder weapon isn't the only thing that remains unidentified. All these years later, the victim is still known only as Jane "Arroyo Grande" Doe, after the desolate desert path where her body had been dumped.

Over the decades, that path became a major interstate and the young officer who arrived on the scene became a seasoned veteran. But every effort by Detective John Williams to identify what he calls "my girl," including exhuming her body last year to gather DNA samples, have brought him no closer to closing the most vexing case of his career.

Now, in a controversial move, the coroner here is taking the search for answers to nagging cases like this to the Internet by posting, in what is believed to be a national first, the photos of dozens of unidentified bodies on the Clark County coroner's Web site.

Several coroner and medical examiner Web sites around the United States publish information about so-called "cold cases," and some even accompany the blurbs with artists' renderings or clay-model representations that approximate what the deceased looked like when alive. But at www.accessclarkcounty.net, a prominent box beseeches visitors to "help identify human remains." A few clicks -- and a couple of warnings about graphic content -- later, the screen is filled with thumbnail-size pictures that can be enlarged to show actual shots of dead people.

The warning states that "no decomposed remains will be shown," and some of the photos have been retouched to erase the more gruesome trauma. But many remain difficult to view.

.... "I just don't know if actual photos are the best way to accomplish this," said Sgt. Mike Harper, operations manager for the Alameda County coroner's office in Oakland. "A good description of the Doe and the circumstances would probably be just as beneficial as having a photo. If the photo is a clean shot of the face, maybe that's OK, but I don't think there's a need to go into the grotesque end of things."

... Yet Clark County says its approach is working. Since the launch in November, the site has received more than 350,000 hits and has helped identify as many as a dozen people, said Assistant Coroner Les Elliot.

... "It's something we're exploring at this point to see if it's feasible," said Herb Hawley of the San Francisco County medical examiner's office. "I don't believe we'll be putting up actual photos. The most we would do is put up sketches."

But Todd Matthews of the Doe Network, a national organization of volunteers and aggrieved relatives searching for missing loved ones, said he supports the effort.

"They're showing reality, and sometimes it's hard to hide this reality from the public," Matthews said. "They're definitely bringing some attention to cases that otherwise have not seen the light of day for years."

Williams, still trying to bring justice to Jane "Arroyo Grande" Doe, holds out hope that Matthews is right and someone will someday help resolve his case.

"If you look on TV, you'll see worse than what you see in this photo of my girl," Williams said. "If it's my daughter, I'd definitely feel bad to see a picture of her dead. But it would not bother me if someone saw it on the Internet or TV to give me some closure and my family some closure. I'm sure things will offend people, but so be it. You got a young kid, dumped in the desert. That's more offensive."
 
update--after initially posting this I noted that someone had suggested this match on the AGJD Facebook page in September... however I could not locate any replies or updates to that post...and TK is still not listed as a ruleout on AGJD's NAMUS page as of today


Hello,

So I checked NAMUS and Tina Faye Kemp [14, DE] is not listed as a ruleout. I am considering submitting her as a possible match for AGJD based on the below, and would appreciate everyone's thoughts:

-same age range [would be 15 in 1980]
-same height range
-same eye color
-similar dental pattern [diastema top front teeth ]
-prior history of running away
-similar face shape to reconstruction sketch
-similar nose shape to reconstruction sketch

I do note some discrepancies:
-sheer distance from Delaware to Nevada
-AGJD had an 'S' tattoo [which was relatively recent], Tina was not reported to have any
-Tina's profile states she had a small mole on one of her arms, no mole was reported on AGJD

tina's NAMUS page: https://www.findthemissing.org/en/cases/6937/0/

Let me know what you all think.

AGJD-tinaKemp.PNG
 
I SAY YES DO IT ! The mole is a easy overlook, and if the tat was recent no one would know to report it ! do it do it :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
122
Guests online
3,090
Total visitors
3,212

Forum statistics

Threads
592,388
Messages
17,968,281
Members
228,767
Latest member
Mona Lisa
Back
Top