UID Victim: Manorville John Doe, Hispanic male, 5'6", 112 lbs., Namus 2725, found Nov 2000

BigCityAccountant said:

What about Daniel Daryl Standifer, Sr.?

I'm glad you posted the discrepancy Coffeeandacig, because I was about to say Nay...

Missing from Indianapolis Indiana.

He was 41, 5'5" 165lbs. He had had previous jaw surgery.

http://www.nampn.org/cases/standifer_daniel.html

Click to expand...

coffeeandacig said:

His shorts were next to the body, not actually on him. Maybe his state of undress was just another way of his disrespecting the victim. Who knows, maybe LISK used John Doe's clothing to help with the clean up?

Click to expand...

BigCityAccountant said:

Here is the spreadsheets. Note, I included every UID in Suffolk County. The only one who is not in Suffolk is Cherries. I think because there are so many, we may all be confusing which is which. I hope this helps and please let me know if there is corrections or information I should add.

Click to expand...

PictureSnatcher said:

Or the medical examiner is wrong and he wasn't that thin?

Click to expand...

coffeeandacig said:

If we are to believe that Asian Male was picked up by accident, then it is unlikely he made that mistake in this case.

I believe Manorville John Doe was killed at the same time as Jane Doe #6 in early September of 2000.

If she was a working girl then like SG, she had someone waiting in a parked car for her. This time there wasn't any SG screaming to wake up the neighborhood, and thus saving the driver/boyfriend/pimp from entering the house to meet his death, too. MP was lucky to get away because of SG.

This was a 35 year old'ish hispanic male, around 5' 6" and around 130 lbs. His jaw had been wired shut in the early summer of 2000, thus losing close to 20 lbs on a liquid diet. No health issues, no transexuality, no prostitution. Just a driver who LISK had to dispose of, as well.

Click to expand...

coffeeandacig said:

His shorts were next to the body, not actually on him. Maybe his state of undress was just another way of his disrespecting the victim. Who knows, maybe LISK used John Doe's clothing to help with the clean up?

Click to expand...

PictureSnatcher said:

Where in the hell did you get that from? I have never ever seen anything say that. All it says is partially clothed. Also aq few posts up a source says M not XL, so more confusion.

Click to expand...

Evey said:

I wonder if the killer owns a thrift store type place and uses stuff from there throw us off and sells the actual clothes. But I have wondered where the other clothes are and ny guess woukd be about to have sex when strangled from behind but why leave them next to him? Maybe the killer is leaving a hint? The weight and size sounds like a runaway kid or dwarf.maybe he had a pimp break his jaw or a John so it got wired shut

Click to expand...

Armchair-reader said:

If he were a street person he could have just had the crap kicked out of him randomly by ****s. Got the clothes from a homeless shelter but that is a good question where are his other clothes. Maybe he had a few dollars and he was the john. Like you said about to have sex and strangled from behind. Clothes stolen to keep I.D. hidden. ? Maybe

Click to expand...

coffeeandacig said:

Clothing on body	Sparsely clothed
Clothing with body	white & blue srtipe boxer shorts size medium, GAP brand

https://www.identifyus.org/en/cases/2725

It doesn't say ON, only WITH. I don't see where it said XL boxers, only Medium. Why is the age difference so apparent in that article? Are we looking for a guy in his 20s?

Click to expand...

coffeeandacig said:

Clothing on body	Sparsely clothed
Clothing with body	white & blue srtipe boxer shorts size medium, GAP brand

https://www.identifyus.org/en/cases/2725

It doesn't say ON, only WITH. I don't see where it said XL boxers, only Medium. Why is the age difference so apparent in that article? Are we looking for a guy in his 20s?

Click to expand...

PictureSnatcher said:

Isn't it funny how two murders that have been regarded as unrelated to the serial killer case for the last 5 years are clothed exactly the same?

Socks: white and green tube socks Waistband: "Eddie Bauer" "XL"

https://identifyus.org/en/cases/11010

Click to expand...

PictureSnatcher said:

It doesn't literally mean with the body. If his underwear and socks were next to his body, he wouldn't be sparsely clothed would he?

Click to expand...

coffeeandacig said:

I'm just asking the same question that Lindsay Lohan did in post #947 of Manorville Bodies - A Second Killer thread...

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...Killer-Latest-Remains-found-02-17-2012/page64

Click to expand...

PictureSnatcher said:

I don't see anything about the clothing found not on the body. Pretty sure "Clothing on Body" is one of the parameters to fill out on Namus and the report will say "Partially Clothes, Fully Clothed" etc. Then "Clothing with body" describes the clothing that victim was wearing.

Click to expand...

coffeeandacig said:

Clothing on body	Sparsely clothed
Clothing with body	white & blue srtipe boxer shorts size medium, GAP brand

https://www.identifyus.org/en/cases/2725

It doesn't say ON, only WITH. I don't see where it said XL boxers, only Medium. Why is the age difference so apparent in that article? Are we looking for a guy in his 20s?

Click to expand...