Yes, Walter, I have read your article, it is very good!
Here are more questions that got omitted due to my error樂.
4.) Who was called first the mom or the LE?
5.) Why would manager go to the home? I would have made an announcement, that due to a family emergency that the place would be closing. Hand the keys to an employee and leave!
6.) It was reported that the tenant appeared from behind the back of the house holding his cat. Was his life and the cats life of more value than Maggies??
7.) First of all, I understand that fear can paralyze a person-I get that. If the arguing was from strangers, then why didnt the tenant go to Maggies defense? If the arguing voices were familiar, to him, then I could see that he would just try to mind his own business. But when the anger and throwing things, get elevated, wouldnt you think that human nature would kick in?? Youd have to kill me, in order for you to hurt anyone in my presence!
8.) He said that they were trying to set the house on fire. Why would you stay inside and risk burning to death?
As the article that you said you read stated, the tenant called 911 about 7:01 that night.
The manager nor Heather had any idea of the seriousness of the situation. As I said in my article, the only thing the tenant said to Heather was that there was a bang and the lights went out. My sourced notes agree with that, the deputies on the scene heard the bang and saw the lights go out.
First off, the tenant had not idea who was arguing or talking downstairs. If you read my article, that would be obvious. He didn't know there were deputies at the scene, his apartment does not have windows facing the front of the house. He was afraid. He didn't want to walk out of the apartment and run into any "bad" people. He didn't know if Maggie or was downstairs or who was downstairs.
Now what I can say following is anonymous sourcing, but the source is one of the most well known persons in the country.
He had no idea who was arguing downstairs. Nothing in any report, or from my investigation, implies that he knew the voices. Why do you suggest that the "voices" were familiar to him? Do you know something?
When he finally left the apartment, because of the amount of smoke coming up into his living space, he came down with his cat. When he came down from the back of the house to the front of the house (his apartment entrance is at the back of the house), he ran into deputies who told him to put his hands ups.
He said to the deputies that he had a cat in his hands. That was not good enough for the deputies, they basically said "put your f'king hands up."
He dropped the cat and it ran off into the woods.
The next day, the tenant was at the property to try to recover as much as he could from the apartment.
His cat came back that day.
He was very scared over the whole incident and he is now in a place (I know where he is) away from this area. He was rattled and scared and he still is, since he gave a lot of firsthand accounts to law enforcement.
If you may have noticed, our Denver media has not interviewed him. They know his identity (as I do), but he does not want to speak to the press.
In my opinion, you are assuming too much. I have spoken to these people involved (except the tenant), and my on the record sources plus my sources who don't want to go on record (actually I won't ask them to go on record), all have exonerated the tenant from any connection to this incident.
In answer to your final question "He said that they were trying to set the house on fire. Why would you stay inside and risk burning to death?", he was scared *****less.
