FWIW, the right to remain silent, and right to counsel are two different things, and are handled differently, especially if the person is remaining in custody. She may have invoked to remain silent, but with the right to counsel, you're required to be given contact with counsel "within a reasonable time," generally accepted as a few hours. The important difference is if you only exercise the right to remain silence there are a few ways in which LE still may get information from someone, a bit unknowingly. That doesn't work if right to counsel is invoked, it's basically impossible to obtain information without counsel present.
Affidavit: Stepmom smoked marijuana day before reporting Lucas Hernandez missing
According to the probable cause affidavit, Glass told police the day before she made the report she smoked marijuana.
Glass said she was cleaning the family's home, located near Lincoln and Edgemoor, when she went into the garage around 3:30 p.m. and "smoked a few bowls" of marijuana.
Glass told police she got hungry. So, she and her one-year-old daughter, only identified as MH, drove to Olive Garden for dinner.
Glass said she only stayed at Olive Garden for about an hour before driving back home with MH.
The court document says Glass consented to a search of her phone where police found texts on Facebook Messenger between her and JH (Glass' husband, Jonathan Hernandez).
Police say the messages stated Glass was going to smoke a couple of bowls of marijuana and go to Olive Garden using a gift card JH sent her.
The document goes on to say Glass made two phone calls on Feb. 16 at 4:53 p.m. and 5:43 p.m. The phone calls were made from the area of Central and Rock, near where an Olive Garden is located.
http://www.kwch.com/content/news/Af...e-Lucas-Hernandez-went-missing-476690153.html
If she was seen on camera at OG, how is it a red herring?Staring at this:
So, not sure if this has been mentioned, it probably has...
Could OG be a red herring as far as establishing a purposeful known location?
Maybe take the equal and opposite direction, what does that look lIke out of curiosity...?
(Speculative brainstorming, of course)
Near OG or not...thoughts? And if so, or not, why or why not. This will involve a close examination of the time line and mileage.
Staring at this:
So, not sure if this has been mentioned, it probably has...
Could OG be a red herring? Meaning, take the equal distance and go in the opposite direction...?
If she was seen on camera at OG, how is it a red herring?
Would she then later travel in the opposite direction with him?
My gut says she did not put LH in her car at any time after he dies.
She didn't bury him, I doubt she had the right tools.
She's tiny too no way she dug a grave.
He is REALLY close to the home or she handed off to someone else.
Moo
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
If she was seen on camera at OG, how is it a red herring?
Would she then later travel in the opposite direction with him?
My gut says she did not put LH in her car at any time after he dies.
She didn't bury him, I doubt she had the right tools.
She's tiny too no way she dug a grave.
He is REALLY close to the home or she handed off to someone else.
Moo
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Ok- Hold up here. You just brought something to light for me. Child neglect time as instructed-4pmFriday to 6 pm on Saturday . As far as we know, he is NOT eating inside OG. She cleaned, smoked, and went to OG. Who is to say Lucas was not in the vehicle already? One call: Im here ( my car is open take the luggage) Second call: Im leaving . How on Gods green earth do we know he wasnt transported. Going back to initial thoughts: another persons involvement.
Secondly, you cannot prove to the courts that you are changing your ways and are trying to provide a healthy environment for your two boys, when you have two children, 2 adults living in a one bedroom apartment- hence the move. Trying to get more visitation with her boys. A lot of times, the courts want to see that you can provide them a room, a space of their own. This may be where the interview comment of at a time like this comes in. Just putting my thoughts out there to be expanded upon.
MOO
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I missed the info that the apartment they left was a 1 bedroom. Where was that info from? Thanks!
That info was from the very beginning of the case. I will have to go back and find it-sorry I dont have it handy!!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
No worries, I believe you...just missed seeing that...but with this many threads I can't say I'm surprised I missed it or forgot!
Why on earth would EG disclose to LE that she smoked a bowl and the drove her daughter anywhere? And also disclose that Lucas wasn't with her? Why would she tell them this stuff knowing she will be charged?
Probably because she had been mirandized IIRC and knew if she didn't turn over her phone they'd get a subpoena for it. I'm sure they told her that. Precisely. And the info on the messages she had w/JH about smoking and going to eat at OG were on that phone.Why on earth would EG disclose to LE that she smoked a bowl and the drove her daughter anywhere? And also disclose that Lucas wasn't with her? Why would she tell them this stuff knowing she will be charged?
Why did the Mathews' "admit" to leaving Sherin outside alone in the middle of the night?
Or admit to leaving her home alone while they went out to dinner?
Because what they are admitting to is far better than what they actually did.
The truth is so unpleasant that these stories they give are preferable.
If she was seen on camera at OG, how is it a red herring?
Would she then later travel in the opposite direction with him?
My gut says she did not put LH in her car at any time after he dies.
She didn't bury him, I doubt she had the right tools.
She's tiny too no way she dug a grave.
He is REALLY close to the home or she handed off to someone else.
Moo
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk