impatientredhead
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2008
- Messages
- 6,475
- Reaction score
- 35
I'm behind the eightball here but I have to comment fresh from hearing TM speaking to Jamie Floyd just now on truTV.
Defense team member Todd M just told JF that there is NO evidence of a body in the trunk of the car, no evidence of chloroform found, no decomp detected in trunk, no evidence of DNA in car - that the media is reporting these things all based on junk science and the information is false. He states that Forensic science is not supporting the body in the trunk. No DNA, NO Decomp, NO chloroform. He stated this as truth based on Forensic Reports that he has recently read. What gives? What have I been reading? What is the truth? Is there or isn't there? What about the odor in the trunk? What can that be attributed to?
TM leads off by saying no body in area after July 16 as it had been completely searched at that time, no water in November, no odor in area and that the area had been completely searched by numerous groups and agencies to include LE prior to December 2008.
bbm- This interpretation is made by a defense team member. That is all you need to know to answer the rest of your questions. Their primary goal is neither accuracy or truth. Their goal is to spin the facts to benefit their client.
a. regardless of whether there was a body in the trunk Casey's dead child was found in the woods after she failed to report her missing.
b. never and no are terms that will bite you in the rear end everytime. Of course there is DNA in the trunk. There is DNA in the trunk of every person reading this post.
c. every other claim he made there can be disputed as well.
Posturing, nothing more.
