According to Lippman the A's attorney he is discussing a lawsuit with them against Bradley who testified to the 84 searches. The man clearly made a mistake but it appears to be an innocent one which he corrected as soon as he could. CA of course perjures herself and she wants to go after someone who testified falsely but innocently? Your daughter gets off and no charges are pressed against you for perjury and you want to sue? Despicable. Anything for a buck.
What is the basis for their suit? I can't see that they were damaged in any way by this testimony and therefore no basis for a suit.
I think this is more "chatter" to draw all the focus and attention to an error on the prosecution side. A sly attempt to convince people that if this info was inaccurate, then much of the other evidence against Casey Anthony should be considered suspect. More whitewashing.