question re the motion about sex with tony lazarro: JB says throughout the motion that he wants Perry to exclude "prior sexual relations" "past sexual relations" "previous sexual relationship" between tony and casey, does he mean prior to caylee going missing? It's weird and makes no sense. If he means that he wants to exclude any mention of the fact that they ever had sex, including after june 16th, good luck.
I agree. The fact that she had sexual relations with him the entire time Caylee was "missing" IS relevant IMO.
He'll testify about her waking up with nightmares a few times. Why will the jurors think she was sleeping in his bed? Or is that next?