........According to Pistorius, he had brought the fans into the bedroom, closed the sliding doors leading onto his balcony and drawn the curtains.......
Yes it was. And?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
........According to Pistorius, he had brought the fans into the bedroom, closed the sliding doors leading onto his balcony and drawn the curtains.......
Yes it was. And?
...and again....He told the court he could not sleep and that he had brought in two fans from the balcony......
.....and more......Nel was also intent on pointing out discrepancies between Pistorius's bail affidavit and subsequent testimony. The bail affidavit makes reference to Pistorius waking up and going "on to the balcony" to fetch a fan. Pistorius denies being on the balcony. Pistorius explained this apparent discrepancy by saying that the fan was positioned partly on the balcony, and partly inside. His bail affidavit also makes reference to only one fan, whereas Pistorius now says there were two fans. This he explains because a smaller fan was positioned between the tripod legs of the larger fan....and again....He told the court he could not sleep and that he had brought in two fans from the balcony......
Nel is also intent on pointing out discrepancies between Pistorius's bail affidavit and subsequent testimony. The bail affidavit makes reference to Pistorius waking up and going "on to the balcony" to fetch a fan. Pistorius now denies being on the balcony. Pistorius explained this apparent discrepancy by saying that the fan was positioned partly on the balcony, and partly inside.
His bail affidavit also makes reference to only one fan, whereas Pistorius now says there were two fans. This he explains because a smaller fan was positioned between the tripod legs of the larger fan.
...and more...
Only op could add to the affidavit fine so it doesn't matter. The bit about being on the balcony was discussed a few pages back. As was adding to the affidavit in fact
....From IBT....Bedroom fan:
Pistorius said in his bail application soon after Steenkamp's death that he had not gone to the balcony to fetch a fan. But he said later he did move the fan.
Nel claims the account changed because Pistorius realised he needed to place himself in the bedroom in order for his claim about hearing a noise to be credible.
Quoting Pistorius, Nel said: "If someone said they saw me on the balcony they would be lying."
A second fan:
Nel said Pistoruis made up his account of fetching a second fan from the balcony for the purpose of plugging it into an extension cable, because there no extra socket to plug into.
Pistorius initially said he had plugged it in, but later changed his account. Nel called this point "a clear indication of the accused's deceitfulness."
.........is that it....? hey, don't run away now....Pistorius is a liar......no fan was on the patio because the cable wasn't long enough.....the two fans were not plugged in because one socket had the charger for the hair clipper....one of the cables for one fan passed behind a speaker making it too short for the fan to reach the patio.....Pistorius said he went onto the patio and later changed his version....the extension cord went missing after the photos had been taken ....Pistorius said he went to bring in one fan then changed it to two which due to photo evidence showing one of the cables passing behind a speaker makes it obviously another lie........I'm not sure there's any point in discussing further with you tbh. You are now quoting nels allegations as though they are evidence which they most definitely are not. I don't remember him changing his account about whether the second fan was plugged in. And as I've said before I can't see why he should be expected to remember details a year after when it was followed by a shooting. It doesn't matter where the police say things are if there's reason to doubt their evidence. I'm not sure you even read my posts as you keep coming back with replies that lack logic as I've already addressed them.
.........is that it....? hey, don't run away now....Pistorius is a liar......no fan was on the patio because the cable wasn't long enough.....the two fans were not plugged in because one socket had the charger for the hair clipper....one of the cables for one fan passed behind a speaker making it too short for the fan to reach the patio.....Pistorius said he went onto the patio and later changed his version....the extension cord went missing after the photos had been taken ....Pistorius said he went to bring in one fan then changed it to two which due to photo evidence showing one of the cables passing behind a speaker makes it obviously another lie........
..................and here we are...stuck on the fan which is only the beginning.....you don't want to discuss simply because the truth disturbs your rose coloured view of what happened that night....
Pretty sure that Nel's issue with the first fan (the large one) wasn't that it couldn't reach the patio but that it couldn't reach where pistorius said he moved it when he brought it in. Pistorius said it would reach. Nel failed to prove it wouldn't.
......i'll think you'll find that the extension cord needs to be fully extended towards the center of the room for the cable to be long enough and obviously this wasn't the case due to one of the fan cables passing behind a speaker and the second socket being used for the charger for the hair clippers......;...then off course there is a large difference between bringing in one fan or two.....
Which fan cable do you say passed behind the speaker?
Large difference?! Is that the key detail that decides it for you- whether there was a second fan?
Speaking for myself, the issue I have with the OP supporters here is that while on the one hand they question every piece of evidence and assertion that goes against Pistorius on the other they accept all the inconsistencies in his story along with its essentially far fetched nature without displaying any doubts or concerns. That and the fact that they think that 10 months in prison followed by house arrest in a mansion is a suitable punishment for what he did, whoever was behind that door.
........no it's the fact that he had to add on the second fan.....that he brought in two fans....
Speaking for myself, the issue I have with the OP supporters here is that while on the one hand they question every piece of evidence and assertion that goes against Pistorius on the other they accept all the inconsistencies in his story along with its essentially far fetched nature without displaying any doubts or concerns. That and the fact that they think that 10 months in prison followed by house arrest in a mansion is a suitable punishment for what he did, whoever was behind that door.
You doubt that he brought in a second fan and that's what convinces you it was murder? Why?
Speaking for myself, (and I don't class myself as an OP supporter any more than I would label you as an OP nonsupporter) , of course there are doubts and concerns, but the bottom line is that on balance I believe that the state did not prove DD or DE beyond reasonable doubt and that the key aspects of Pistorius's version (perceived intruder-fear-panic-shots) is still clearly possible.